2022
Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Hospitalized Patients
Ortigoza MB, Yoon H, Goldfeld KS, Troxel AB, Daily JP, Wu Y, Li Y, Wu D, Cobb GF, Baptiste G, O’Keeffe M, Corpuz MO, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Amin A, Zacharioudakis IM, Jayaweera DT, Wu Y, Philley JV, Devine MS, Desruisseaux MS, Santin AD, Anjan S, Mathew R, Patel B, Nigo M, Upadhyay R, Kupferman T, Dentino AN, Nanchal R, Merlo CA, Hager DN, Chandran K, Lai JR, Rivera J, Bikash CR, Lasso G, Hilbert TP, Paroder M, Asencio AA, Liu M, Petkova E, Bragat A, Shaker R, McPherson DD, Sacco RL, Keller MJ, Grudzen CR, Hochman JS, Pirofski LA, Rahman F, Ajayi A, Rodriguez S, Ledesma A, Keeling D, Rappoport N, Ebel S, Kim J, Chang M, Chan K, Patel P, Martocci A, Dave S, Darwish Y, Taveras M, Shoyelu V, Xin P, Iturrate E, Moldolsky L, Raimondo B, Mendez S, Hughes P, Sterling S, Lord A, Yaghi S, Veloso K, Sheikh M, Visconti-Ferrara E, Fleming A, Youn H, Jane Fran B, Medina R, McKell R, Khan S, Hamilton T, Sanchez C, Patel N, Cleare L, Vergnolle O, Nakouzi A, Quevedo G, Bortz R, Wirchnianski A, Florez C, Babb R, Ayala J, Tsagaris K, James A, Eke I, Obeidallah A, Sandu O, Sohval S, Serrano-Rahman L, Uehlinger J, Bartash R, Al-Abduladheem A, Gendlina I, Sheridan C, Bortnick A, Eichler J, Kaufman R, Yukelis S, Pennock M, Goggin M, Shen C, Annam J, Khokhar A, Barboto D, Lally B, Lee A, Lee M, Yang X, Allen S, Malaviya A, Moussa O, Park R, Sample R, Bae A, Benoni G, Boerger L, Baker L, Luther M, Ameti L, Briggs N, Golden M, Gormally M, Huang G, Johnson R, Morrison A, Montagna-Hill M, Rivera B, Cortezzo G, Debski K, Nicoletti, DeBenedictis K, Davis R, Marshall C, Duque Cuartas M, Beauchamps L, Bertran-Lopez J, Gonzales Zamora J, Delgado-Lelievre M, Dominguez S, Lee C, Kusack H, Karakeshishyan V, Hajaz A, Deniz D, Garcia G, Dae K, Blenet P, Jaffe D, Olson L, Sabogal D, Blust O, Del Prete Perez V, Bornia C, Rodriguez-Perez V, Calderon V, Ramdev R, Jolly A, Guzman I, Guerra R, Brito S, Hobbs R, Denham R, Dick J, Hernandez M, Nielsen L, Anjum S, Mader S, Stutz T, Mammadova M, Nichols P, Khan T, Boktour M, Castaneda B, Benitez B, Hinojosa E, Guerra B, Ortiz A, Hebbeler-Clark R, McShane P, Hibbard R, Hawkins B, Dohanich E, Wadle C, Greenlee K, Brooks J, Herrick C, Gode A, Bergl P, Hu K, Patel J, Srinivasan S, Graf J, Klis C, Reimer K, Carpenter E, Naczek C, Petersen R, Dex R, Drossart J, Zelten J, Brummitt C, Liang M, Yanny L, Dennison G, Runningen P, Brzezinski B, Fiebig S, Naczek C, Kasdorf M, Parameswaran L, Corcoran A, Rohatgi A, Wronska M, Wu X, Srinivasan R, Deng F, Filardo T, Pendse J, Blaser S, Whyte O, Gallagher J, Thomas O, Ramos D, Sturm-Reganato C, Fong C, Daus I, Payoen A, Chiofolo J, Friedman M, Wu D, Jacobson J, Schneider J, Sarwar U, Wang H, Huebinger R, Dronavalli G, Bai Y, Grimes C, Eldin K, Umana V, Martin J, Heath T, Bello F, Ransford D, Laurent-Rolle M, Shenoi S, Akide-Ndunge O, Thapa B, Peterson J, Knauf K, Patel S, Cheney L, Tormey C, Hendrickson J. Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Internal Medicine 2022, 182: 115-126. PMID: 34901997, PMCID: PMC8669605, DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6850.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCCP recipientsPlacebo recipientsSecondary outcomesSymptom durationHospitalized patientsPrimary outcomeDay 28COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 serostatusSARS-CoV-2 titersWorld Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scaleCOVID-19 convalescent plasmaConvalescent plasma usePlacebo-controlled trialLess daysExploratory subgroup analysisNon-Hispanic blacksSARS-CoV-2CCP efficacyConcomitant medicationsAdverse eventsClinical improvementSymptom onsetConvalescent plasmaMedian ageLenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer
Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, Santin AD, Colomba E, Miller DS, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira-Frommer R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim YM, Guerra EM, Sanli UA, McCormack MM, Smith AD, Keefe S, Bird S, Dutta L, Orlowski RJ, Lorusso D. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine 2022, 386: 437-448. PMID: 35045221, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2108330.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdvanced endometrial cancerProgression-free survivalEndometrial cancerOverall survivalMedian progression-free survivalPlatinum-based chemotherapy regimenLonger progression-free survivalEnd pointBlinded independent central reviewMedian overall survivalPrimary end pointPhase 3 trialResponse Evaluation CriteriaPlatinum-based chemotherapyIndependent central reviewChemotherapy regimenAdverse eventsStandard therapyCentral reviewPembrolizumabGrade 3LenvatinibChemotherapyPhysician's choicePatients
2021
Prognostic impact of mismatch repair deficiency in high- and low-intermediate-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer following vaginal brachytherapy
Li JY, Park HS, Huang GS, Young MR, Ratner E, Santin A, Damast S. Prognostic impact of mismatch repair deficiency in high- and low-intermediate-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer following vaginal brachytherapy. Gynecologic Oncology 2021, 163: 557-562. PMID: 34602287, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrence-free survivalEndometrioid endometrial cancerVaginal brachytherapyPMMR patientsOverall survivalEEC patientsEndometrial cancerExact testThree-year recurrence-free survivalEarly-stage endometrial cancerCox proportional hazards regressionPoor recurrence-free survivalAdjuvant vaginal brachytherapyThree-year OSMultivariable Cox regressionLympho-vascular invasionSignificant prognostic variablesProportional hazards regressionLog-rank testKaplan-Meier estimatesDeficient mismatch repairMismatch repair statusFisher's exact testMismatch repair deficiencyDMMR statusMinimal uterine serous carcinoma and endometrial polyp: a close clinicopathological relationship
Assem H, Rottmann D, Finkelstein A, Wang M, Ratner E, Santin AD, Buza N, Hui P. Minimal uterine serous carcinoma and endometrial polyp: a close clinicopathological relationship. Human Pathology 2021, 118: 1-8. PMID: 34508766, DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.09.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMinimal uterine serous carcinomaEndometrial polypsUterine serous carcinomaSerous carcinomaHigh stage patientsLow stage patientsPelvic washing cytologyAdvanced stage diseaseEndometrial serous carcinomaHigher stage diseaseLower tumor stageClinical outcome assessmentClose topographic relationshipBackground endometriumExtrauterine diseaseExtrauterine spreadStage diseaseExcellent prognosisLymphovascular invasionClinicopathological relationshipWashing cytologyTumor stageHigh riskPatientsLarge seriesDHES0815A, a novel antibody-drug conjugate targeting HER2/neu, is highly active against uterine serous carcinomas in vitro and in vivo
Tymon-Rosario J, Bonazzoli E, Bellone S, Manzano A, Pelligra S, Guglielmi A, Gnutti B, Nagarkatti N, Zeybek B, Manara P, Zammataro L, Harold J, Mauricio D, Buza N, Hui P, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Ratner E, Clark M, Andikyan V, Huang GS, Silasi DA, Azodi M, Schwartz PE, Santin AD. DHES0815A, a novel antibody-drug conjugate targeting HER2/neu, is highly active against uterine serous carcinomas in vitro and in vivo. Gynecologic Oncology 2021, 163: 334-341. PMID: 34452746, PMCID: PMC8722447, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBenzodiazepinesBystander EffectCell Line, TumorCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesMiddle AgedPrimary Cell CultureReceptor, ErbB-2TrastuzumabUterine NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysConceptsHER2/neuPrimary USC cell linesUSC cell linesUterine serous carcinomaSerous carcinomaHER2/Cell linesBystander killingHER2/neu protein expressionHER2/neu overexpressionProtein expressionNovel treatment optionsAggressive histologic variantNeu protein expressionHER2 protein expressionC-erbB2 gene amplificationSignificant bystander killingUSC xenograftsEndometrial cancerNegative tumorsPoor prognosisPositive tumorsTreatment optionsPreclinical activityHistologic variantsTrastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu
Tymon-Rosario J, Siegel ER, Bellone S, Harold J, Adjei N, Zeybek B, Mauricio D, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Ratner E, Clark M, Andikyan V, Huang GS, Azodi M, Schwartz PE, Fader AN, Santin AD. Trastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu. Gynecologic Oncology 2021, 163: 93-99. PMID: 34372971, PMCID: PMC8721852, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUterine serous carcinomaRecurrent uterine serous carcinomaAdverse eventsTreatment armsSerous carcinomaExperimental armToxicity profileTreatment-related adverse eventsTrastuzumab maintenance therapyCarboplatin/paclitaxelCardiac adverse eventsEndometrial cancer patientsGastrointestinal adverse eventsManageable toxicity profilePhase II trialEfficacy of trastuzumabSystem organ classII trialMaintenance therapyPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsMaintenance treatmentSafety profileCancer patientsCumulative toxicity
2020
Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin–Paclitaxel Compared with Carboplatin–Paclitaxel–Trastuzumab in Advanced (Stage III–IV) or Recurrent Uterine Serous Carcinomas that Overexpress Her2/Neu (NCT01367002): Updated Overall Survival Analysis
Fader AN, Roque DM, Siegel E, Buza N, Hui P, Abdelghany O, Chambers S, Secord AA, Havrilesky L, O'Malley DM, Backes FJ, Nevadunsky N, Edraki B, Pikaart D, Lowery W, ElSahwi K, Celano P, Bellone S, Azodi M, Litkouhi B, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Schwartz PE, Santin AD. Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin–Paclitaxel Compared with Carboplatin–Paclitaxel–Trastuzumab in Advanced (Stage III–IV) or Recurrent Uterine Serous Carcinomas that Overexpress Her2/Neu (NCT01367002): Updated Overall Survival Analysis. Clinical Cancer Research 2020, 26: 3928-3935. PMID: 32601075, PMCID: PMC8792803, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0953.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinChemotherapy, AdjuvantCystadenocarcinoma, SerousCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDrug Administration ScheduleEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelProgression-Free SurvivalReceptor, ErbB-2Survival AnalysisTrastuzumabConceptsProgression-free survivalRandomized phase II trialPhase II trialOverall survivalHER2/neuStage IIICarboplatin-paclitaxelII trialRecurrent diseaseControl armSurvival analysisRecurrent uterine serous carcinomaCarboplatin/paclitaxelUterine serous carcinomaOverall survival analysisEvaluable patientsEligible patientsPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsEndometrial cancerAggressive variantSerous carcinomaPrimary treatmentSurvival medianPatientsHuman epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study
Erickson BK, Najjar O, Damast S, Blakaj A, Tymon-Rosario J, Shahi M, Santin A, Klein M, Dolan M, Cimino-Mathews A, Buza N, Ferriss JS, Stone RL, Khalifa M, Fader AN. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study. Gynecologic Oncology 2020, 159: 17-22. PMID: 32709539, PMCID: PMC7541557, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalReceptor, ErbB-2Retrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUterine NeoplasmsUterusConceptsHuman epidermal growth factor 2Uterine serous carcinomaHER2-positive tumorsEarly-stage diseaseOverall survivalSerous carcinomaCohort studyHER2 positivityPositive tumorsEarly stage uterine serous carcinomaLymph-vascular space invasionRecurrent uterine serous carcinomaMulti-institutional cohort studyHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Multi-center cohort studyEpidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor 2HER2-positive cohortGrowth factor receptor 2HER2-negative tumorsEquivocal IHC resultsFactor receptor 2Inferior PFSAdjuvant therapyGrowth factor 2Stage III uterine serous carcinoma: modern trends in multimodality treatment
Li JY, Young MR, Huang G, Litkouhi B, Santin A, Schwartz PE, Damast S. Stage III uterine serous carcinoma: modern trends in multimodality treatment. Journal Of Gynecologic Oncology 2020, 31: e53. PMID: 32266802, PMCID: PMC7286763, DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e53.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUterine serous carcinomaExternal beam RTVaginal brachytherapyOverall survivalHuman epidermal growth factor receptorModern treatment eraSentinel node samplingRegional nodal recurrenceKaplan-Meier estimatesLog-rank testCox proportional hazardsExternal beam radiotherapyEpidermal growth factor receptorERA treatmentGrowth factor receptorUSC patientsFree survivalNodal recurrenceTreatment eraMultimodality treatmentPatient characteristicsPerioperative periodRegional nodalSerous carcinomaNode samplingDerangements in HUWE1/c-MYC pathway confer sensitivity to the BET bromodomain inhibitor GS-626510 in uterine cervical carcinoma
Bonazzoli E, Bellone S, Zammataro L, Gnutti B, Guglielmi A, Pelligra S, Nagarkatti N, Manara P, Tymon-Rosario J, Zeybek B, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Han C, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Huang GS, Andikyan V, Azodi M, Schwartz PE, Santin AD. Derangements in HUWE1/c-MYC pathway confer sensitivity to the BET bromodomain inhibitor GS-626510 in uterine cervical carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology 2020, 158: 769-775. PMID: 32600791, PMCID: PMC8253557, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.484.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansImidazolesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIsoxazolesMiceMiddle AgedProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysYoung AdultConceptsC-myc expressionC-Myc pathwayTwice-daily oral dosesC-MycWestern blotChemotherapy-resistant diseaseUterine cervical carcinomaPotential therapeutic targetEffective therapeutic agentDose-response decreaseCC xenograftsCell line growthOral dosesCervical carcinomaPrimary tumorDeletion/mutationClinical studiesTherapeutic targetTherapeutic agentsNormal tissuesBET inhibitorsVivo activityQRT-PCRCell proliferationGene deletion/mutationModeling biological and genetic diversity in upper tract urothelial carcinoma with patient derived xenografts
Kim K, Hu W, Audenet F, Almassi N, Hanrahan AJ, Murray K, Bagrodia A, Wong N, Clinton TN, Dason S, Mohan V, Jebiwott S, Nagar K, Gao J, Penson A, Hughes C, Gordon B, Chen Z, Dong Y, Watson PA, Alvim R, Elzein A, Gao SP, Cocco E, Santin AD, Ostrovnaya I, Hsieh JJ, Sagi I, Pietzak EJ, Hakimi AA, Rosenberg JE, Iyer G, Vargas HA, Scaltriti M, Al-Ahmadie H, Solit DB, Coleman JA. Modeling biological and genetic diversity in upper tract urothelial carcinoma with patient derived xenografts. Nature Communications 2020, 11: 1975. PMID: 32332851, PMCID: PMC7181640, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15885-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBiopsyCamptothecinCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoconjugatesInterleukin Receptor Common gamma SubunitMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm TransplantationPhenotypePrecision MedicineProspective StudiesQuinolinesRetrospective StudiesSequence Analysis, RNATrastuzumabUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrotheliumConceptsUpper tract urothelial carcinomaUrothelial carcinomaCorresponding patient tumorsEstablishment of patientHigh genomic concordancePersonalized medicine strategiesHER2 kinase inhibitorDisease-specific modelsUTUC patientsCell line modelsPDX modelsBladder cancerTreatment paradigmGenomic concordanceInvasive tumorsSuperior efficacyPatient tumorsPatientsKinase inhibitorsAntibody drugsMedicine strategiesBiological heterogeneityCarcinomaXenograftsTumorsFirst-in-Human, Multicenter, Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Anti-Mesothelin Antibody–Drug Conjugate Anetumab Ravtansine in Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Hassan R, Blumenschein GR, Moore KN, Santin AD, Kindler HL, Nemunaitis JJ, Seward SM, Thomas A, Kim SK, Rajagopalan P, Walter AO, Laurent D, Childs BH, Sarapa N, Elbi C, Bendell JC. First-in-Human, Multicenter, Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Anti-Mesothelin Antibody–Drug Conjugate Anetumab Ravtansine in Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 1824-1835. PMID: 32213105, PMCID: PMC7255978, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02085.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnetumab ravtansineDose-escalation cohortsMetastatic solid tumorsAnti-mesothelin antibodySolid tumorsExpansion cohortClinical activityCommon drug-related adverse eventsDrug-related adverse eventsPhase I Dose-EscalationMultiple solid tumor typesPhase IDose-expansion studyI Dose-EscalationPeripheral sensory neuropathyPhase II studyRecurrent ovarian cancerRecurrent solid tumorsPreliminary antitumor activityDrug-related deathsFavorable pharmacokinetic profileSolid tumor typesAntibody-drug conjugatesStable diseaseAdult patientsPhase II evaluation of nivolumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent cervical cancer (NCT02257528/NRG-GY002)
Santin AD, Deng W, Frumovitz M, Buza N, Bellone S, Huh W, Khleif S, Lankes HA, Ratner ES, O'Cearbhaill RE, Jazaeri AA, Birrer M. Phase II evaluation of nivolumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent cervical cancer (NCT02257528/NRG-GY002). Gynecologic Oncology 2020, 157: 161-166. PMID: 31924334, PMCID: PMC7127981, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.034.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTreatment-related adverse eventsRecurrent cervical cancerPD-L1 expressionPlatinum-based chemotherapyCervical cancerStable diseaseGrade 3 treatment-related adverse eventsGrade 4 treatment-related adverse eventsGrade 5 treatment-related adverse eventsECOG PS 0Prior systemic therapyRecurrent cervical carcinomaResponse/toxicitySingle-agent nivolumabSystemic chemotherapy regimenTolerability of nivolumabImmune checkpoint inhibitorsPercent of patientsAcceptable safety profilePhase II trialKey eligibility criteriaPhase II evaluationECOG PSNivolumab 3RECIST 1.1
2019
HER2 testing of gynecologic carcinosarcomas: tumor stratification for potential targeted therapy
Rottmann D, Snir OL, Wu X, Wong S, Hui P, Santin AD, Buza N. HER2 testing of gynecologic carcinosarcomas: tumor stratification for potential targeted therapy. Modern Pathology 2019, 33: 118-127. PMID: 31477811, DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0358-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEndometrial serous carcinomaHER2-positive tumorsSerous carcinomaSarcoma componentHER2 statusGynecologic carcinosarcomaHER2 expression/amplificationRecent phase II clinical trialPhase II clinical trialCarboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapyEquivocal HER2 expressionProgression-free survivalAppropriate patient selectionExpression/amplificationFemale genital tractMembranous staining patternHER2 protein expressionHER2 immunohistochemical scoresUterine primaryDismal prognosisPatient selectionCarcinoma componentMixed carcinomasHER2 expressionClinical trialsAntitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study
Matulonis UA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin AD, Lisyanskaya AS, Pignata S, Vergote I, Raspagliesi F, Sonke GS, Birrer M, Provencher DM, Sehouli J, Colombo N, González-Martín A, Oaknin A, Ottevanger PB, Rudaitis V, Katchar K, Wu H, Keefe S, Ruman J, Ledermann JA. Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study. Annals Of Oncology 2019, 30: 1080-1087. PMID: 31046082, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz135.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrent ovarian cancerObjective response rateDisease control rateProgression-free survivalTreatment-free intervalDuration of responseAdvanced recurrent ovarian cancerPD-L1 expressionPlatinum-free intervalCohort AOverall survivalPrior linesCohort BOvarian cancerHigh PD-L1 expressionLow objective response rateMedian DORSolid Tumors version 1.1End pointGynecologic cancer-related deathBlinded independent central reviewSafety of pembrolizumabSingle-agent pembrolizumabMedian overall survivalPhase II studyAdjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma
Deshmukh U, Black J, Perez-Irizarry J, Passarelli R, Levy K, Rostkowski A, Hui P, Rutherford TJ, Santin AD, Azodi M, Silasi DA, Ratner E, Litkouhi B, Schwartz PE. Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma. Reproductive Sciences 2019, 26: 600-608. PMID: 29843577, DOI: 10.1177/1933719118778801.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow-grade endometrial stromal sarcomaRecurrence-free survivalStage I patientsEndometrial stromal sarcomaAromatase inhibitorsI patientsStage IIStromal sarcomaAdvanced low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomaMean recurrence-free survivalLonger recurrence-free survivalAdjuvant hormonal therapyMedian followProgestin groupUnderwent hysterectomyHormonal therapyDisease recurrenceSide effectsPatientsStage IProgestinsMonthsSarcomaDiseaseTreatmentGOG 8020/210: Risk stratification of lymph node metastasis, disease progression and survival using single nucleotide polymorphisms in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study
Brooks RA, Tritchler DS, Darcy KM, Lankes HA, Salani R, Sperduto P, Guntupalli S, DiSilvestro P, Kesterson J, Olawaiye AB, Moxley K, Waggoner S, Santin A, Rader JS, Kizer NT, Thaker PH, Powell MA, Mutch DG, Birrer MJ, Goodfellow PJ. GOG 8020/210: Risk stratification of lymph node metastasis, disease progression and survival using single nucleotide polymorphisms in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecologic Oncology 2019, 153: 335-342. PMID: 30827726, PMCID: PMC6486855, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.028.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProgression-free survivalLymph node metastasisHazard ratioOverall survivalNode metastasisSingle nucleotide polymorphismsOdds ratioNRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group studyG alleleGynecologic Oncology Group studyEndometrioid endometrial cancer patientsGynecologic Oncology GroupEndometrial cancer patientsPrognostic clinical variablesWorse OSOncology GroupEEC patientsEndometrial cancerNodal metastasisPrimary outcomeClinical outcomesRisk stratificationWashington University SchoolClinical variablesCancer patientsSacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Bardia A, Mayer IA, Vahdat LT, Tolaney SM, Isakoff SJ, Diamond JR, O'Shaughnessy J, Moroose RL, Santin AD, Abramson VG, Shah NC, Rugo HS, Goldenberg DM, Sweidan AM, Iannone R, Washkowitz S, Sharkey RM, Wegener WA, Kalinsky K. Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine 2019, 380: 741-751. PMID: 30786188, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1814213.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinCell Adhesion MoleculesDiarrheaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesInfusions, IntravenousIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaProgression-Free SurvivalSurvival RateTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerSacituzumab govitecan-hziyProgression-free survivalClinical benefit rateIndependent central reviewBreast cancerResponse rateAdverse eventsOverall survivalCentral reviewBenefit rateHuman trophoblast cell surface antigen 2Refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancerTrophoblast cell surface antigen 2Median progression-free survivalSN-38Shorter progression-free survivalCell surface antigen 2Blinded independent central reviewDurable objective responsesPrevious anticancer therapyUnacceptable toxic effectsObjective response rateMain adverse reactionsPI3K oncogenic mutations mediate resistance to afatinib in HER2/neu overexpressing gynecological cancers
Bonazzoli E, Cocco E, Lopez S, Bellone S, Zammataro L, Bianchi A, Manzano A, Yadav G, Manara P, Perrone E, Haines K, Espinal M, Dugan K, Menderes G, Altwerger G, Han C, Zeybek B, Litkouhi B, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Huang GS, Azodi M, Schwartz PE, Santin AD. PI3K oncogenic mutations mediate resistance to afatinib in HER2/neu overexpressing gynecological cancers. Gynecologic Oncology 2019, 153: 158-164. PMID: 30630630, PMCID: PMC6430698, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAfatinibAgedAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesClass Ia Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansMiceMice, SCIDMiddle AgedMutationPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, ErbB-2TransfectionXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysConceptsHER2/neuAKT/mTOR pathwayPIK3CA mutationsMTOR pathwayActivity of afatinibEffect of afatinibPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayPotential mechanismsPIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathwayRapid tumor growthGreater compensatory increasePI3K mutationsAmplification/mutationOncogenic PIK3CA mutationsAfatinib exposurePIK3CA H1047RGynecological cancerClinical trialsMTOR inhibitorsAfatinibTumor growthCompensatory increasePhosphorylated Akt proteinPIK3CA geneC-erbTen-Year Comparison Study of Type 1 and 2 Endometrial Cancers: Risk Factors and Outcomes
Feinberg J, Albright B, Black J, Lu L, Passarelli R, Gysler S, Whicker M, Altwerger G, Menderes G, Hui P, Santin AD, Azodi M, Silasi DA, Ratner ES, Litkouhi B, Schwartz PE. Ten-Year Comparison Study of Type 1 and 2 Endometrial Cancers: Risk Factors and Outcomes. Gynecologic And Obstetric Investigation 2019, 84: 290-297. PMID: 30602164, DOI: 10.1159/000493132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsType 2 cancerHormone replacement therapyCox regression modelType 2 diseaseRisk factorsEndometrial cancerType 1Use of HRTLess obese patientsBaseline risk factorsEndometrial cancer casesMajor cardiovascular diseasesObese patientsOral contraceptivesOverall survivalClinical courseDiabetes mellitusRetrospective reviewRegression modelsReplacement therapyCardiovascular diseaseCancer casesAdvanced stageHigh mortalityRecurrence