2024
Peripheral blood immune parameters, response, and adverse events after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer
Foldi J, Blenman K, Marczyk M, Gunasekharan V, Polanska A, Gee R, Davis M, Kahn A, Silber A, Pusztai L. Peripheral blood immune parameters, response, and adverse events after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2024, 1-9. PMID: 39002068, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07426-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImmune-related adverse eventsTriple-negative breast cancerAssociated with pathological responsePathological complete responseNeoadjuvant chemotherapyCytokine levelsPathological responseAdverse eventsBreast cancerEarly-stage triple-negative breast cancerPatients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitorsB cell clonal expansionMeasured serum cytokine levelsImmune checkpoint inhibitorsGM-CSF levelsPeripheral blood cytokine levelsBlood cytokine levelsSerum cytokine levelsB cell receptorMagnetic bead panelBenjamini-Hochberg correctionSample of patientsImmunoSEQ platformCheckpoint inhibitorsComplete responseNeoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy/adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: quality-of-life results from the randomized KEYNOTE-522 study
Dent R, Cortés J, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park Y, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching P, Cardoso F, Haiderali A, Jia L, Nguyen A, Pan W, O’Shaughnessy J, Schmid P. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy/adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: quality-of-life results from the randomized KEYNOTE-522 study. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2024, djae129. PMID: 38913881, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae129.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEarly-stage triple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerLS mean changeBaseline to weekPatient-reported outcomesAdjuvant pembrolizumabBetween-group differencesKEYNOTE-522Neoadjuvant phaseAdjuvant phaseBreast cancerMean changePathological complete responseEvent-free survivalQuality-of-life resultsNeoadjuvant pembrolizumabPatient-reported outcome assessmentsComplete responseNeoadjuvant chemotherapyEORTC QLQ-30PembrolizumabQuality-of-lifeSecondary objectivesQLQ-30PlaceboNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2–Negative Breast Cancer
Ríos-Hoyo A, Cobain E, Huppert L, Beitsch P, Buchholz T, Esserman L, van 't Veer L, Rugo H, Pusztai L. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2–Negative Breast Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 2632-2636. PMID: 38593393, DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02614.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2023
Breast cancers with high proliferation and low ER-related signalling have poor prognosis and unique molecular features with implications for therapy
Licata L, Barreca M, Galbardi B, Dugo M, Viale G, Győrffy B, Karn T, Pusztai L, Gianni L, Callari M, Bianchini G. Breast cancers with high proliferation and low ER-related signalling have poor prognosis and unique molecular features with implications for therapy. British Journal Of Cancer 2023, 129: 2025-2033. PMID: 37935787, PMCID: PMC10703787, DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02477-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPoor prognosisBreast cancerTreatment responseHigher pathological complete response rateResponse rateHigh pathological response ratePathological complete response ratePathological response rateComplete response rateHigher proliferationHigh recurrence riskMolecular featuresEndocrine therapyLower ERHigh TMBDismal outcomePIK3CA mutationsMethodsGene expression dataClinical dataT cellsPotential therapyRecurrence riskTumorsUnique molecular featuresPembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Takahashi M, Cortés J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Denkert C, Park Y, Im S, Ahn J, Mukai H, Huang C, Chen S, Kim M, Jia L, Li X, Tryfonidis K, Karantza V, Iwata H, Schmid P. Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2023, 6: e2342107. PMID: 37966841, PMCID: PMC10652156, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42107.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEarly triple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerEvent-free survivalPathologic complete responseChemotherapy groupNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerNeoadjuvant pembrolizumabDefinitive surgeryComplete responseMAIN OUTCOMEEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusCell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) statusDeath ligand 1 (PD-L1) statusTreatment-related adverse eventsNonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancerCycles of pembrolizumabPembrolizumab Plus ChemotherapyTumor PD-L1Unacceptable toxic effectsPD-L1 statusOverall survival analysisAdjuvant pembrolizumabEFS eventsEFS rates356P Prognostic value of the residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular breast cancer: An international pooled cohort study
Gottipati S, Earl H, Yau C, Cameron D, Abraham J, Hayward L, Reyal F, Osdoit M, Sonke G, Wesseling J, Boughey J, Goetz M, DeMichele A, Pusztai L, Sharma P, Jimenez M, Cobo S, Del Monte-Millan M, Symmans F, Mukhtar R. 356P Prognostic value of the residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular breast cancer: An international pooled cohort study. Annals Of Oncology 2023, 34: s325-s326. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.535.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLBA20 A randomized, double-blind trial of nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) ± NIVO in patients (pts) with high-risk, ER+ HER2− primary breast cancer (BC)
Loi S, Curigliano G, Salgado R, Diaz R, Delaloge S, Rojas C, Kok M, Manich C, Harbeck N, Mittendorf E, Yardley D, Pusztai L, Zaizar A, Ungureanu A, Ades F, Chandra R, Nathani R, Pacius M, Wu J, McArthur H. LBA20 A randomized, double-blind trial of nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) ± NIVO in patients (pts) with high-risk, ER+ HER2− primary breast cancer (BC). Annals Of Oncology 2023, 34: s1259-s1260. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment efficacy score: a better surrogate for arm-level survival differences in neoadjuvant breast cancer trials?
Chehayeb R, Kahn A, Pusztai L. Treatment efficacy score: a better surrogate for arm-level survival differences in neoadjuvant breast cancer trials? Future Oncology 2023, 19: 1945-1951. PMID: 37767612, DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1203.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchExcellent long-term survivalNeoadjuvant breast cancer trialsResidual cancer burden scorePathologic complete responseBreast cancer trialsLong-term survivalNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathologic responseComplete responseSurvival improvementBurden scoreResidual diseaseTrial armsSurvival differencesCancer trialsBreast cancerTreatment efficacyStage IIGood surrogateEfficacy scoresTrialsSurvivalScoresRate differencesChemotherapyNeoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early, Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Catching Up with the Rest
Kim L, Coman M, Pusztai L, Park T. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early, Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Catching Up with the Rest. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2023, 30: 6441-6449. PMID: 37349612, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13714-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerTumor mutational burdenBreast cancerAdjuvant therapyPathological complete response rateImmune checkpoint modulationComplete response rateExcellent clinical outcomesCombination immunochemotherapyNeoadjuvant immunotherapyNeoadjuvant settingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalPD-L1Checkpoint modulationClinical outcomesMajor trialsMutational burdenResponse rateCancer typesCancerTherapyBiomarkersOutcomesExciting advancesMammaPrint Index as a predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer in NBRST.
Beitsch P, Pellicane J, Pusztai L, Baron P, Cobain E, Murray M, Ashikari A, Kelemen P, Mislowsky A, Barone J, Cowan K, Layeequr Rahman R, Dooley W, Menicucci A, Finn C, Audeh M, Whitworth P. MammaPrint Index as a predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and outcome in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer in NBRST. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 521-521. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.521.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDistant metastasis-free survivalPathological complete responseNeoadjuvant chemotherapyHigh riskGrade 3 tumorsLymph node statusObservational prospective studyHigh-risk tumorsKaplan-Meier analysisStage breast cancerLog-rank testPrediction of chemosensitivityESBC patientsMammaPrint testSYMPHONY trialsFree survivalNeoadjuvant therapyClinicopathologic subtypesComplete responseDistant metastasisImmune therapyMeier analysisRisk tumorsNode statusProspective studyImage analysis-based tumor infiltrating lymphocytes measurement predicts breast cancer pathologic complete response in SWOG S0800 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial
Fanucci K, Bai Y, Pelekanou V, Nahleh Z, Shafi S, Burela S, Barlow W, Sharma P, Thompson A, Godwin A, Rimm D, Hortobagyi G, Liu Y, Wang L, Wei W, Pusztai L, Blenman K. Image analysis-based tumor infiltrating lymphocytes measurement predicts breast cancer pathologic complete response in SWOG S0800 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial. Npj Breast Cancer 2023, 9: 38. PMID: 37179362, PMCID: PMC10182981, DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00535-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPathologic complete responseBreast cancerComplete responseTIL scoreBreast Cancer Pathologic Complete ResponseTumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scoresEvent-free survivalNeoadjuvant chemotherapy trialsLymphocyte measurementsLymphocyte scoreNeoadjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy trialsMean pretreatmentResidual diseaseTIL quantificationPredictive valuePretreatment samplesResponse discriminationScoresStrong positive correlationPositive correlationResponse to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess K, André F, Tordai A, Mejia J, Symmans W, Gonzalez-Angulo A, Hennessy B, Green M, Cristofanilli M, Hortobagyi G, Pusztai L. Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 1809-1815. PMID: 36989609, DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02572.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTriple-negative breast cancerPathologic complete response rateNeoadjuvant chemotherapyResidual diseaseBreast cancerProgesterone receptorEstrogen receptorHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expressionSurvival rateEpidermal growth factor receptor 2 expressionProgression-free survival ratesM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterComplete response rateOverall survival rateAnderson Cancer CenterReceptor 2 expressionLong-term survivalBone recurrenceNeoadjuvant therapyPostrecurrence survivalVisceral metastasesWorse OSWorse survivalRelapse rateCancer Center
2022
Clinical Outcomes and Immune Markers by Race in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Durvalumab Concomitant with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC.
Foldi J, Kahn A, Silber A, Qing T, Reisenbichler E, Fischbach N, Persico J, Adelson K, Katoch A, Chagpar A, Park T, Blanchard A, Blenman K, Rimm DL, Pusztai L. Clinical Outcomes and Immune Markers by Race in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Durvalumab Concomitant with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC. Clinical Cancer Research 2022, 28: 3720-3728. PMID: 35903931, PMCID: PMC9444984, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0862.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsImmune-related adverse eventsTriple-negative breast cancerNon-AA patientsEvent-free survivalPhase I/II clinical trialsClinical trialsNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalAA patientsEarly-stage triple-negative breast cancerIncidence of irAEsPathologic complete response rateSignificant associationMultivariate logistic regression analysisTumor-infiltrating lymphocyte countsComplete response ratePrimary efficacy endpointPD-L1 statusProportional hazards modelLogistic regression analysisAfrican American womenEFS ratesNeoadjuvant immunotherapyEfficacy endpointAdverse eventsPrediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (SWOG S0800) using image analysis-based tumor infiltrating lymphocyte measurements.
Blenman K, Fanucci K, Bai Y, Pelekanou V, Nahleh Z, Shafi S, Burela S, Barlow W, Sharma P, Thompson A, Godwin A, Rimm D, Hortobagyi G, Pusztai L. Prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer (SWOG S0800) using image analysis-based tumor infiltrating lymphocyte measurements. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2022, 40: 594-594. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.594.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPathologic complete responseBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyComplete responseTIL scoreResidual diseaseResponse predictive markersBetter EFSBevacizumab benefitLymphocyte measurementsTIL assessmentFree survivalPredictive markerTIL quantificationInternational guidelinesPretreatment samplesLogistic regressionCancerOutcome discriminationChemotherapyScoresContinuous scoresTumorsClinical adoptionStrong positive correlationTreatment Efficacy Score—continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials
Marczyk M, Mrukwa A, Yau C, Wolf D, Chen Y, Balassanian R, Nanda R, Parker B, Krings G, Sattar H, Zeck J, Albain K, Boughey J, Liu M, Elias A, Clark A, Venters S, Shad S, Basu A, Asare S, Buxton M, Asare A, Rugo H, Perlmutter J, DeMichele A, Yee D, Berry D, Veer L, Symmans W, Esserman L, Pusztai L, Consortium I. Treatment Efficacy Score—continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials. Annals Of Oncology 2022, 33: 814-823. PMID: 35513244, DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.072.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTrial armsExperimental armSurvival differencesExact testPathologic complete response rateClinical trial armsI-SPY2 trialNeoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacyComplete response rateBreast cancer trialsCytotoxic efficacyFisher's exact testImpact of treatmentNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPCR ratePathologic responseResidual cancerControl cohortCancer trialsAssessed associationsChemotherapy efficacyEarly surrogateOlaparib armResponse rateHigher cytotoxic efficacyEvent-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Andersen J, Patt D, Danso M, Ferreira M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Im SA, Ahn JH, Gion M, Baron-Hay S, Boileau JF, Ding Y, Tryfonidis K, Aktan G, Karantza V, O'Shaughnessy J. Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. New England Journal Of Medicine 2022, 386: 556-567. PMID: 35139274, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2112651.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProgression-Free SurvivalTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsConceptsEarly triple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerEvent-free survivalCycles of pembrolizumabPathological complete responseDefinitive surgeryBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyComplete responseLonger event-free survivalUntreated stage IIPrimary end pointPhase 3 trialSecond primary cancerDoxorubicin-cyclophosphamideNeoadjuvant pembrolizumabNeoadjuvant phaseAdjuvant therapyDistant recurrenceNeoadjuvant therapyAdverse eventsPrimary cancerSafety profileDisease progressionPembrolizumab
2021
Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients
Yau C, Osdoit M, van der Noordaa M, Shad S, Wei J, de Croze D, Hamy AS, Laé M, Reyal F, Sonke GS, Steenbruggen TG, van Seijen M, Wesseling J, Martín M, del Monte-Millán M, López-Tarruella S, Consortium I, Adamson K, Albain K, Asare A, Asare S, Balassanian R, Beckwith H, Berry S, Berry D, Boughey J, Buxton M, Chen Y, Chen B, Chien A, Chui S, Clark A, Clennell J, Datnow B, DeMichele A, Duan X, Edmiston K, Elias A, Ellis E, Esserman L, Euhus D, Fadare O, Fan F, Feldman M, Forero-Torres A, Haley B, Han H, Harada S, Haugen P, Helsten T, Hirst G, Hylton N, Isaacs C, Kemmer K, Khan Q, Khazai L, Klein M, Krings G, Lang J, LeBeau L, Leyland-Jones B, Liu M, Lo S, Lu J, Magliocco A, Matthews J, Melisko M, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Moulder S, Murthy R, Nanda R, Northfelt D, Ocal I, Olopade O, Pambuccian S, Paoloni M, Park J, Parker B, Perlmutter J, Peterson G, Pusztai L, Rendi M, Rugo H, Sahoo S, Sams S, Sanil A, Sattar H, Schwab R, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Stringer-Reasor E, Symmans W, Tawfik O, Tripathy D, Troxell M, Veer L, Venters S, Vinh T, Viscusi R, Wallace A, Wei S, Wilson A, Yau C, Yee D, Zeck J, Boughey J, Goetz M, Hoskin T, Gould R, Valero V, Edge S, Abraham J, Bartlett J, Caldas C, Dunn J, Earl H, Hayward L, Hiller L, Provenzano E, Sammut S, Thomas J, Cameron D, Graham A, Hall P, Mackintosh L, Fan F, Godwin A, Schwensen K, Sharma P, DeMichele A, Cole K, Pusztai L, Kim M, van 't Veer L, Esserman L, Symmans W. Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients. The Lancet Oncology 2021, 23: 149-160. PMID: 34902335, PMCID: PMC9455620, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00589-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsResidual cancer burdenEvent-free survivalRCB scoreHER2-positive groupNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancer subtypesBreast cancerHazard ratioCancer subtypesNodal statusCancer burdenT categoryEvent-free survival eventsPooled patient-level analysisLong-term survival outcomesPractice settingsWorse event-free survivalClinical T categoryHigher RCB scoresStandard pathology reportingHER2-negative patientsHormone receptor statusHER2-negative groupLong-term prognosisPrimary stage IComparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen
Olawoyin OM, Mehta S, Chouairi F, Gabrick KS, Avraham T, Pusztai L, Alperovich M. Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2021, 148: 1186-1196. PMID: 34644277, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008505.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy regimensMicrovascular breast reconstructionNeoadjuvant chemotherapyChemotherapy regimensComplication rateFat necrosisBreast reconstructionImmune cellsCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELMultivariate binary logistic regressionYale-New Haven HospitalAdministration of taxanesBreast Reconstruction ComplicationsInclusion of anthracyclinesNeoadjuvant chemotherapy regimenDosage of chemotherapyNew Haven HospitalNeoadjuvant chemotherapy completionLogistic regression modelsBinary logistic regressionOncologic historyTaxane administrationChemotherapy regimenChemotherapy completionPathologic responseTumor-Specific Major Histocompatibility-II Expression Predicts Benefit to Anti–PD-1/L1 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Primary Breast CancerMHC-II Is an Immunotherapy Biomarker in Early Breast Cancer
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Wulfkhule JD, Gallagher RI, Sun X, Axelrod ML, Sheng Q, Luo N, Gomez H, Sanchez V, Sanders M, Pusztai L, Petricoin E, Blenman K, Balko JM, Institute A, Leyland-Jones B, Agency C, Chia S, Serpanchy R, Yu C, University E, McMillan S, Mosley R, Nguyen K, Wood E, Zelnak A, University G, Dillis C, Donnelly R, Harrington T, Isaacs C, Kallakury B, Liu M, Lynce F, Oppong B, Pohlmann P, Tousimis E, Warren R, Willey S, Wong J, Zeck J, Center L, Albain K, Bartolotta M, Bova D, Brooks C, Busby B, Czaplicki K, Duan X, Gamez R, Ganesh K, Gaynor E, Godellas C, Grace-Louthen C, Kuritza T, Lo S, Nagamine A, Perez C, Robinson P, Rosi D, Vaince F, Ward K, Hospital I, Choquette K, Edmiston K, Gallimore H, McGovern J, Mokarem K, Pajaniappan M, Rassulova S, Scott K, Sherwood K, Wright J, Clinic A, Anderson K, Gray R, Myers S, Northfelt D, Pockaj B, Roedig J, Wasif N, Clinic R, Arens A, Boughey J, Brandt K, Carroll J, Chen B, Connors A, Degnim A, Farley D, Greenlee S, Haddad T, Hieken T, Hobday T, Jakub J, Liberte L, Liu M, Loprinzi C, Menard L, Moe M, Moynihan T, O'Sullivan C, Olson E, Peethambaram P, Ruddy K, Russell B, Rynearson A, Smith D, Visscher D, Windish A, Institute H, Cox K, Dawson K, Newton O, Ramirez W, University O, Bengtson H, Bucher J, Chui S, Gilbert-Ghormley B, Hampton R, Kemmer K, Kurdyla D, Nauman D, Spear J, Wilson A, Institute S, Beatty D, Dawson P, Ellis E, Fer M, Hanson J, Goetz M, Haddad T, Iriarte D, Kaplan H, Porter B, Rinn K, Thomas H, Thornton S, Tickman R, Varghis N, Birmingham U, Caterinichia V, Santos J, Falkson C, Forero A, Krontiras H, Vaklavas C, Wei S, University of Arizona, Bauland A, Inclan L, Lewallen D, Powell A, Roney C, Schmidt K, Viscusi R, Wright H, University of California S, Blair S, Boles S, Bykowski J, Datnow B, Densley L, Eghtedari M, Genna V, Hasteh F, Helsten T, Kormanik P, Ojeda-Fournier H, Onyeacholem I, Parker B, Podsada K, Schwab R, Wallace A, Yashar C, University of California S, Alvarado M, Au A, Balassanian R, Benz C, Buxton M, Chen Y, Chien J, D'Andrea C, Davis S, Esserman L, Ewing C, Goga A, Hirst G, Hwang M, Hylton N, Joe B, Lyandres J, Kadafour M, Krings G, Melisko M, Moasser M, Munter P, Ngo Z, Park J, Price E, Rugo H, Veer L, Wong J, Yau C, University of Chicago, Abe H, Jaskowiak N, Nanda R, Olopade F, Schacht D, University of Colorado D, Borges V, Colvin T, Diamond J, Elias A, Finlayson C, Fisher C, Hardesty L, Kabos P, Kounalakis N, Mayordomo J, McSpadden T, Murphy C, Rabinovitch R, Sams S, Shagisultanova E, University of Kansas, Baccaray S, Khan Q, University of Minnesota, Beckwith H, Blaes A, Emory T, Haddad T, Hui J, Klein M, Kuehn-Hajder J, Nelson M, Potter D, Tuttle T, Yee D, Zera R, University of Pennsylvania, Bayne L, Bradbury A, Clark A, DeMichele A, Domchek S, Fisher C, Fox K, Frazee D, Lackaye M, Matro J, McDonald E, Rosen M, Shah P, Tchou J, Volpe M, Center U, Alvarez R, Barcenas C, Berry D, Booser D, Brewster A, Brown P, Gonzalez-Angulo A, Ibrahim N, Karuturi M, Koenig K, Moulder S, Murray J, Murthy R, Pusztai L, Saigal B, Symmans W, Tripathy D, Theriault R, Ueno N, Valero V, California U, Brown M, Carranza M, Flores Y, Lang J, Luna A, Perez N, Tripathy D, Watkins K, Center U, Armstrong S, Boyd C, Chen L, Clark V, Frankel A, Euhus D, Froehlich T, Goudreau S, Haley B, Harker-Murray A, Klemow D, Leitch A, Leon R, Li H, Morgan T, Qureshi N, Rao R, Reeves M, Rivers A, Sadeghi N, Seiler S, Staves B, Tagoe V, Thomas G, Tripathy D, Unni N, Weyandt S, Wooldridge R, Zuckerman J, Universty of Washington, Korde L, Griffin M, Butler B, Cundy A, Rubinstein L, Hixson C. Tumor-Specific Major Histocompatibility-II Expression Predicts Benefit to Anti–PD-1/L1 Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Primary Breast CancerMHC-II Is an Immunotherapy Biomarker in Early Breast Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 2021, 27: 5299-5306. PMID: 34315723, PMCID: PMC8792110, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0607.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyTriple-negative breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerMHC-IITumor cellsAnti-PD-1/L1 therapyEstrogen receptor-positive breast cancerPhase II/III clinical trialsNeoadjuvant breast cancer settingPathologic complete response rateHER2-negative breast cancerReceptor-positive breast cancerAddition of immunotherapyHLA-DR positivityBreast cancer settingComplete response rateHER2-negative patientsCohort of patientsEarly breast cancerMHC-II expressionPan-cancer biomarkerImmunotherapy benefitL1 therapyMost patientsDurvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial
Pusztai L, Yau C, Wolf DM, Han HS, Du L, Wallace AM, String-Reasor E, Boughey JC, Chien AJ, Elias AD, Beckwith H, Nanda R, Albain KS, Clark AS, Kemmer K, Kalinsky K, Isaacs C, Thomas A, Shatsky R, Helsten TL, Forero-Torres A, Liu MC, Brown-Swigart L, Petricoin EF, Wulfkuhle JD, Asare SM, Wilson A, Singhrao R, Sit L, Hirst GL, Berry S, Sanil A, Asare AL, Matthews JB, Perlmutter J, Melisko M, Rugo HS, Schwab RB, Symmans WF, Yee D, Van't Veer LJ, Hylton NM, DeMichele AM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Durvalumab with olaparib and paclitaxel for high-risk HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: Results from the adaptively randomized I-SPY2 trial. Cancer Cell 2021, 39: 989-998.e5. PMID: 34143979, PMCID: PMC11064785, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerI-SPY2 trialBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyStage II/III HER2-negative breast cancerStage II/III breast cancerGrade 3 adverse eventsPathologic complete response ratePD-L1 inhibitor durvalumabMast cell signaturePaclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapyComplete response rateHER2-negative patientsStandard neoadjuvant chemotherapyHER2-negative cancersPARP inhibitor olaparibAdverse eventsGene expression signaturesCare controlSuperior efficacyImmune responseResponse rateCancerInhibitor olaparib