2021
Differences by race in systemic oncologic end-of-life (EOL) care among patients with cancer.
Adelson K, Wang X, Ascha M, Miksad R, Showalter T, Calip G, Gross C, Canavan M. Differences by race in systemic oncologic end-of-life (EOL) care among patients with cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 137-137. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.137.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBlack patientsWhite patientsAggressive EOL careRetrospective cohort studyPractice-level factorsPractice-level characteristicsRacial differencesDe-identified databaseLogistic regression modelsAnti-cancer therapyElectronic health recordsImmunotherapy eraCohort studyICI useOncologic treatmentPayer cohortHigh patientEOL careAdjusted ratesOutcome measuresEOL treatmentMedicaid coveragePatientsPhysician ratioRoutine practiceTrends in end-of- life (EOL) systemic oncologic treatment in contemporary clinical practice: Insights from real-world data.
Canavan M, Wang X, Ascha M, Miksad R, Showalter T, Calip G, Gross C, Adelson K. Trends in end-of- life (EOL) systemic oncologic treatment in contemporary clinical practice: Insights from real-world data. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 253-253. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.253.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDay of deathReal-world practiceTraditional chemotherapyCancer treatmentStudy periodPractice-level factorsOverall healthcare utilizationSystemic cancer treatmentRates of chemotherapyDays of lifeDe-identified databaseContemporary clinical practiceLogistic regression modelsElectronic health recordsCancer care organizationsSystemic therapySystemic treatmentOncologic treatmentHealthcare utilizationImmune therapyTargeted therapyStratified analysisHigher total costsLife careOncolytic therapy
2018
Monitoring InBaskets With Feedback to Providers Enhances the Timeliness of Patient Care.
Trant AA, Strait M, Kaplan R, Dest V, Roshka A, Lyons CA, Vest KA, Steffen T, Chiang A, Adelson KB. Monitoring InBaskets With Feedback to Providers Enhances the Timeliness of Patient Care. JCO Oncology Practice 2018, 14: e310-e315. PMID: 29641273, DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00103.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
An EPIC electronic decision support tool to identify percentage of patients with stage IV thoracic or gastrointestinal malignancy who would benefit from concurrent palliative care but do not currently receive it.
Adelson K, Trant A, Framski K, Swidler M, Kashyap N. An EPIC electronic decision support tool to identify percentage of patients with stage IV thoracic or gastrointestinal malignancy who would benefit from concurrent palliative care but do not currently receive it. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 133-133. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.8_suppl.133.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEpic electronic health recordConcurrent palliative carePalliative careOncologic careElectronic decision support toolPalliative care visitsPC referral rateSmilow Cancer HospitalStandard oncologic careYale-New HavenPalliative care consultStage IV diseasePercentage of patientsPalliative care servicesHealth care utilizationICD-10 diagnosisQuality of lifeVolume of patientsElectronic health recordsAlign careCare consultEligible patientsPC referralEnd of lifeIOM guidelines
2016
Electronic Intervention to Improve Structured Cancer Stage Data Capture
Cecchini M, Framski K, Lazette P, Vega T, Strait M, Adelson K. Electronic Intervention to Improve Structured Cancer Stage Data Capture. JCO Oncology Practice 2016, 12: e949-e956. PMID: 27650837, DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.013540.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStaging rateElectronic health recordsCancer stageClinical trial eligibilityElectronic decision supportTrial eligibilityMonths postinterventionCancer stagingPhysician useClinical notesBPA implementationProblem listHealth recordsElectronic interventionMonthsTreatment planningCancerStagingPhysiciansAct methodologyInterventionUnstructured free textHard stopBPAPatients
2013
Implementation of Electronic Chemotherapy Ordering: An Opportunity to Improve Evidence-Based Oncology Care
Adelson KB, Qiu YC, Evangelista M, Spencer-Cisek P, Whipple C, Holcombe RF. Implementation of Electronic Chemotherapy Ordering: An Opportunity to Improve Evidence-Based Oncology Care. JCO Oncology Practice 2013, 10: e113-e119. PMID: 24371301, DOI: 10.1200/jop.2013.001184.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsElectronic health recordsEvidence-based practiceEvidence-based adherenceEvidence-based treatmentsAntiemetic useChemotherapy prescribingSupportive careChemotherapy protocolsInfusion scheduleSociety guidelinesOncology careDisease groupOncology practiceChemotherapy orderingProvider satisfactionPrespecified goalsPatient carePatient safetyExtensive involvementHealth recordsCareChemotherapyWait timeAdherenceClinical operationsDevelopment of a new oncology quality metric: The rate of evidence-based adherence.
Adelson K, Holcombe R. Development of a new oncology quality metric: The rate of evidence-based adherence. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 84-84. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.31_suppl.84.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEvidence-based adherenceClinical evidenceEvidence-based practiceEvidence-based clinical pathwayElectronic health recordsNCCN guidelinesBreast groupDose modificationCancer CenterDisease groupClinical trialsClinical pathwayPatient careProportion of protocolsHealth recordsProvider ratesAdherenceGroup rateElectronic protocolFirst cycleGroupWide variationChemotherapyNumber of timesIndividual protocols