2022
The Effect of Black Cohosh on Ki67 expression and Tumor Volume: A Pilot Study of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Patients
Trant A, Chagpar A, Wei W, Neumeister V, Rimm D, Stavris K, Lurie B, Frederick C, Andrejeva L, Raghu M, Killelea B, Horowitz N, Lannin D, Knill-Selby E, Sturrock T, Hofstatter E. The Effect of Black Cohosh on Ki67 expression and Tumor Volume: A Pilot Study of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Patients. Integrative Cancer Therapies 2022, 21: 15347354221137290. PMID: 36444764, PMCID: PMC9716631, DOI: 10.1177/15347354221137290.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCimicifugaEstrogen AntagonistsFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenPilot ProjectsTumor BurdenConceptsTumor volumeBlack cohoshSitu patientsDuctal carcinomaAnti-inflammatory effectsTumor cellular proliferationBreast cancer treatmentCellular proliferationWilcoxon signed-rank testDCIS patientsAdverse eventsEligible subjectsWindow trialsCore biopsyInvasive diseaseKi67 expressionSigned-rank testBreast cancerGrade 3Hormone changesPatientsQuantitative immunofluorescenceBC extractSignificant toxicityCancer treatment
2020
Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update
Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, Hayes DF, Lakhani SR, Chavez-MacGregor M, Perlmutter J, Perou CM, Regan MM, Rimm DL, Symmans WF, Torlakovic EE, Varella L, Viale G, Weisberg TF, McShane LM, Wolff AC. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update. Archives Of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 2020, 144: 545-563. PMID: 31928354, DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0904-sa.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAmerican Medical AssociationBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingEstrogensFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMedical OncologyPathologistsPathology, ClinicalPrognosisReceptors, ProgesteroneSystematic Reviews as TopicUnited StatesConceptsClinical Oncology/CollegeProgesterone receptor testingEstrogen receptorBreast cancerEndocrine therapyReceptor testingExpert panelAmerican Pathologists (CAP) guideline updatesClinical practice guideline recommendationsMultidisciplinary international expert panelEndocrine therapy benefitPractice guideline recommendationsBreast cancer guidelinesER-positive cancersInvasive breast cancerFuture breast cancerAmerican SocietyBreast cancer samplesInternational expert panelReporting of casesPgR testingTumor cell nucleiCancer guidelinesGuideline recommendationsGuideline update
2018
Macrodissection prior to closed system RT-qPCR is not necessary for estrogen receptor and HER2 concordance with IHC/FISH in breast cancer
Gupta S, Mani NR, Carvajal-Hausdorf DE, Bossuyt V, Ho K, Weidler J, Wong W, Rhees B, Bates M, Rimm DL. Macrodissection prior to closed system RT-qPCR is not necessary for estrogen receptor and HER2 concordance with IHC/FISH in breast cancer. Laboratory Investigation 2018, 98: 1076-1083. PMID: 29858579, PMCID: PMC6119113, DOI: 10.1038/s41374-018-0064-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceParaffin EmbeddingPathology, ClinicalReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptor, ErbB-2Receptors, EstrogenReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTissue FixationConceptsIHC/FISHDCIS cohortRT-qPCRMRNA transcript levelsDuctal carcinoma casesFine needle aspiratesMRNA expression levelsHER2 concordanceER positivityDuctal carcinomaHER2 expressionGeneXpert systemCarcinoma casesInvasive tumorsNeedle biopsyBreast cancerEstrogen receptorClinical ImmunohistochemistryBiopsy areaTumor tissueMRNA expressionTumor areaCohortMRNA levelsMRNA markers
2017
Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors
Hendry S, Salgado R, Gevaert T, Russell PA, John T, Thapa B, Christie M, van de Vijver K, Estrada MV, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders M, Solomon B, Solinas C, Van den Eynden GGGM, Allory Y, Preusser M, Hainfellner J, Pruneri G, Vingiani A, Demaria S, Symmans F, Nuciforo P, Comerma L, Thompson EA, Lakhani S, Kim SR, Schnitt S, Colpaert C, Sotiriou C, Scherer SJ, Ignatiadis M, Badve S, Pierce RH, Viale G, Sirtaine N, Penault-Llorca F, Sugie T, Fineberg S, Paik S, Srinivasan A, Richardson A, Wang Y, Chmielik E, Brock J, Johnson DB, Balko J, Wienert S, Bossuyt V, Michiels S, Ternes N, Burchardi N, Luen SJ, Savas P, Klauschen F, Watson PH, Nelson BH, Criscitiello C, O’Toole S, Larsimont D, de Wind R, Curigliano G, André F, Lacroix-Triki M, van de Vijver M, Rojo F, Floris G, Bedri S, Sparano J, Rimm D, Nielsen T, Kos Z, Hewitt S, Singh B, Farshid G, Loibl S, Allison KH, Tung N, Adams S, Willard-Gallo K, Horlings HM, Gandhi L, Moreira A, Hirsch F, Dieci MV, Urbanowicz M, Brcic I, Korski K, Gaire F, Koeppen H, Lo A, Giltnane J, Rebelatto MC, Steele KE, Zha J, Emancipator K, Juco JW, Denkert C, Reis-Filho J, Loi S, Fox SB. Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors. Advances In Anatomic Pathology 2017, 24: 235-251. PMID: 28777142, PMCID: PMC5564448, DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000162.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPathologistsConceptsTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesTIL assessmentInvasive breast carcinomaSolid tumor typesBreast carcinomaSolid tumorsTumor typesDifferent solid tumor typesForm of immunotherapyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsEra of immunotherapyImportant prognostic informationRoutine clinical biomarkersHost immune responseWorking Group guidelinesDiverse solid tumor typesCheckpoint inhibitorsMetastatic settingPrognostic informationGroup guidelinesImmune responseEosin sectionsHistopathologic specimensClinical validityPredictive significance
2011
Loss of Nuclear Localized and Tyrosine Phosphorylated Stat5 in Breast Cancer Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome and Increased Risk of Antiestrogen Therapy Failure
Peck AR, Witkiewicz AK, Liu C, Stringer GA, Klimowicz AC, Pequignot E, Freydin B, Tran TH, Yang N, Rosenberg AL, Hooke JA, Kovatich AJ, Nevalainen MT, Shriver CD, Hyslop T, Sauter G, Rimm DL, Magliocco AM, Rui H. Loss of Nuclear Localized and Tyrosine Phosphorylated Stat5 in Breast Cancer Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome and Increased Risk of Antiestrogen Therapy Failure. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2011, 29: 2448-2458. PMID: 21576635, PMCID: PMC3675698, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.30.3552.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationPhosphotyrosinePrognosisProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSTAT5 Transcription FactorSurvival AnalysisTreatment FailureTumor Suppressor ProteinsYoung AdultConceptsNode-negative breast cancerCancer-specific survivalIndependent prognostic markerBreast cancerWhole tissue sectionsTherapy failurePrognostic markerTissue microarrayPathologist scoringMultivariate analysis patientsSystemic adjuvant therapyAdjuvant hormone therapyMarker of prognosisPoor clinical outcomeUseful predictive markerPredictors of responseNormal breast epitheliumTissue sectionsCohort IVAdjuvant therapyHormone therapyAnalysis patientsClinical outcomesDuctal carcinomaProspective study
2006
Construction and Validation of Tissue Microarrays of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Terminal Duct Lobular Units Associated With Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Yang XR, Charette LA, Garcia-Closas M, Lissowska J, Paal E, Sidawy M, Hewitt SM, Rimm DL, Sherman ME. Construction and Validation of Tissue Microarrays of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Terminal Duct Lobular Units Associated With Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology 2006, 15: 157-161. PMID: 16932071, DOI: 10.1097/01.pdm.0000213453.45398.e0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTissue Array AnalysisConceptsTerminal duct lobular unitsTissue microarrayEstrogen receptorDuctal carcinomaProgesterone receptorBreast cancerLobular unitsLarge case-control studyPR expression levelsCase-control studyInvasive breast carcinomaPercentage of tubulesInvasive carcinomaEpithelial lesionsBreast carcinomaImmunohistochemical characterizationImmunohistochemical stainingPeritumoral tissuesPositive stainingScoring systemCarcinomaCategorical scoring systemBreast tissueMethodologic studyExpression levels
2003
Detection of chromosomal instability in paired breast surgery and ductal lavage specimens by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.
King BL, Tsai SC, Gryga ME, D'Aquila TG, Seelig SA, Morrison LE, Jacobson KK, Legator MS, Ward DC, Rimm DL, Phillips RF. Detection of chromosomal instability in paired breast surgery and ductal lavage specimens by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clinical Cancer Research 2003, 9: 1509-16. PMID: 12684427.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingChromosome AberrationsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasm InvasivenessTherapeutic IrrigationConceptsDuctal lavageMalignant casesBenign casesBreast lesionsBreast cellsInvasive breast cancerInterphase fluorescenceBreast cancer progressionAbnormal cytologyLavage cellsSitu hybridizationBreast surgeryBreast cancerEarly neoplasiaConventional cytologyLavageGenetic abnormalitiesCancer progressionNew modalityNumeric changesSitu hybridization analysisSurgeryLesionsCytologyAbnormalities