2024
Selective cultural adoption: The roles of warmth, competence, morality and perceived indispensability in majority‐group acculturation
Kunst J, Bierwiaczonek K, Obaidi M, Fluit S, von Soest T, Sam D, Dovidio J. Selective cultural adoption: The roles of warmth, competence, morality and perceived indispensability in majority‐group acculturation. British Journal Of Social Psychology 2024 PMID: 39283045, DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12801.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
The Missing Side of Acculturation: How Majority-Group Members Relate to Immigrant and Minority-Group Cultures
Kunst J, Lefringhausen K, Sam D, Berry J, Dovidio J. The Missing Side of Acculturation: How Majority-Group Members Relate to Immigrant and Minority-Group Cultures. Current Directions In Psychological Science 2021, 30: 485-494. DOI: 10.1177/09637214211040771.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMajority group membersSocio-structural processesCultural orientationMinority group culturesEthnic minority groupsMinority group membersDiverse societyMinority groupsIntercultural contactMajority groupAcculturationImmigrantsTimely issueFuture researchMissing sideMembersConceptual modelSocietyCountriesResearchIndividualsIssuesSalientImplicationsDecades
2017
The systematic study of how subtle forms of bias related to prosocial behavior operate in racial and gender relations
Abad-Merino S, Dovidio J, Tabernero C, González I. The systematic study of how subtle forms of bias related to prosocial behavior operate in racial and gender relations. Theory & Psychology 2017, 28: 104-121. DOI: 10.1177/0959354317745588.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGender relationsCross-cultural researchHierarchical group relationsDynamics of relationsPower of womenSubtle formsCross-cultural dataPsychological researchSocial psychologyProsocial behaviorExplicit hostilityContemporary biasMinority groupsRacial minoritiesSocial advantagesGroup relationsCentral thesisUnderrepresented groupsProductive directionsModern societyFuture researchGroup hierarchyPresent literature reviewSocietyBias
2016
The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration
Gaertner S, Guerra R, Rebelo M, Dovidio J, Hehman E, Deegan M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration. 2016, 105-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0_5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelIdentity modelOne-group representationMinority group membersMembers of majorityGroup members' preferencesGroup distinctivenessFunctional perspectiveGroup goalsIdentity representationMinority groupsGroup membersMajority groupDual identityGroup disparitiesMembers' preferencesOne-groupSubgroup identificationCollective actionRepresentationFunctional approachAttentionPreferencesPrejudiceDistinctivenessIncluded but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We”
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Ufkes E, Saguy T, Pearson A. Included but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We”. Social Issues And Policy Review 2016, 10: 6-46. DOI: 10.1111/sipr.12017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocial categorization processesIntergroup attitudesIntergroup biasRoots of biasCategorization processGroup membershipSubtle biasDarker SideWay peopleShared identityCommon identitySubtle natureMinority groupsBiasDifferent perspectivesSeparate groupsRecategorizationPotential consequencesBiasesDifferent preferencesIdentityAttitudesColorblindnessDiscriminationIntervention
2013
Racial healthcare disparities: A social psychological analysis
Penner L, Hagiwara N, Eggly S, Gaertner S, Albrecht T, Dovidio J. Racial healthcare disparities: A social psychological analysis. European Review Of Social Psychology 2013, 24: 70-122. PMID: 25197206, PMCID: PMC4151477, DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2013.840973.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocial psychological processesSocial psychological analysisSocial psychological theoriesEthnic majority groupTheory-based interventionPsychological processesPsychological theoriesSocial categorizationStereotype activationPsychological analysisInterpersonal factorsLevels of analysisSocial identityRacial biasInterpersonal levelMajority groupMultilevel modelsCore premiseEthnic minority groupsFeelingsConceptual analysisMinority groupsRacial health disparitiesThoughtIntervention
2010
How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children?
Guerra R, Rebelo M, Monteiro M, Riek B, Mania E, Gaertner S, Dovidio J. How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2010, 13: 445-460. DOI: 10.1177/1368430209355651.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMinority group childrenIntergroup biasOutgroup childrenOutgroup membersProcess of generalizationGroup goalsGroup childrenGroup identityMajority groupDual identityPositive attitudesOutgroupOne-groupFunctional perspectiveAttitudesChildrenAdditional analysesMinority groupsBiasIdentitySessionsGoalRepresentationPerspective
2008
The Fragility of Intergroup Relations
Pearson A, West T, Dovidio J, Powers S, Buck R, Henning R. The Fragility of Intergroup Relations. Psychological Science 2008, 19: 1272-1279. PMID: 19121137, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02236.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntergroup contactIntergroup interactionsPositive intergroup contactIntergroup relationsIntergroup communicationGreater anxietyDyadic conversationsLess anxietyDelay conditionsTemporal disruptionReal-time conversationsAnxietyPractical implicationsEthnic majorityAudiovisual feedbackLatino participantsDyadsSocial dynamicsConversationMinority groupsLess interestDisengagementIntergroupParticipantsDynamic process
2007
Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Saguy T. Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review Of Social Psychology 2007, 18: 296-330. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701726132.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelCommon ingroup identityMinority group perspectivesIntergroup biasesIngroup identityIntergroup interactionsIdentity modelSocial categorisationGroup perspectiveRecent researchDifferent preferencesMinority groupsPotential implicationsSocial changeRecategorisationPrejudiceDifferent formsBiasesResearchSelfIdentityPreferencesInitial formulationDiscriminationImplications
2004
Aversive Racism
Dovidio J, Gaertner S. Aversive Racism. Advances In Experimental Social Psychology 2004, 36: 1-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36001-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAversive racismInterracial interactionsRacial biasesPsychological factorsNegative feelingsMajority groupUnited StatesRacial politicsEgalitarian idealsRacismEgalitarian principlesMinority groupsPotential conflictsBasic evidenceFeelingsBiasesBeliefsEndorsementPoliticsBlacksConflictChapterDiscriminationIdealHomosexuals
1998
Relationship of Solo Status, Academic Rank, and Perceived Distinctiveness to Job Satisfaction of Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Niemann Y, Dovidio J. Relationship of Solo Status, Academic Rank, and Perceived Distinctiveness to Job Satisfaction of Racial/Ethnic Minorities. Journal Of Applied Psychology 1998, 83: 55-71. PMID: 9494440, DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.55.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsJob satisfactionSolo statusPerception of distinctivenessPsychology departmentsSituational salienceStigmatized groupsRacial/Ethnic MinoritiesSubjective feelingsEthnic minoritiesToken statusDistinctivenessSatisfactionFeelingsMinority groupsAcademic rankSaliencePerceptionLower academic ranksAfrican AmericansRelationshipMinorityImplications