2017
Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions
Dovidio J, Love A, Schellhaas F, Hewstone M. Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2017, 20: 606-620. DOI: 10.1177/1368430217712052.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup contactIntergroup relationsIndividual-level outcomesIndividual-level processesIntergroup biasMultiple categorizationEffect of contactContact hypothesisClassic researchGroup processTemporal stagesContact theoryResearch directionsFuture directionsConceptual foundationsVaried outcomesSocial changeDirect relationshipBroader viewAntecedentsDifferent formsResearchRecent workCategorizationOutcomes
2008
All in this together? Group representations and policy support
Beaton A, Dovidio J, Léger N. All in this together? Group representations and policy support. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44: 808-817. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.002.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2003
Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Esses V, Brewer M. Social Conflict, Harmony, and Integration. 2003, 485-506. DOI: 10.1002/0471264385.wei0520.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identityDifferent psychological mechanismsSocial categorization theoryDifferent group identitiesSense of identityIntergroup prejudiceIntergroup contactIngroup identityIntergroup relationsPsychological mechanismsPsychological researchPsychological perspectiveSocial categorizationCategorization theoryContact hypothesisPersonalized perceptionsSocial conflictGroup identityNature of biasSocial integrationSocial harmonyConflictCollective identityFunctional relationBiasIntergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Kawakami K. Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2003, 6: 5-21. DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006001009.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1996
Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Bachman B. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal Of Intercultural Relations 1996, 20: 271-290. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00019-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identityIntergroup biasIngroup identityOutgroup membersContact hypothesisCommon ingroup identity modelFormer outgroup membersDual identitySuperordinate group identityIntergroup attitudesCognitive representationsMotivational processesIngroup membersSuperordinate identityIdentity modelCooperative interdependencePositive feelingsGreater perceptionSituational contextGroup identityMembers' perceptionsContextual featuresPerceptionSocial entitiesEgalitarian normsThe Contact Hypothesis: The Role of a Common Ingroup Identity on Reducing Intergroup Bias among Majority and Minority Group Members
Gaertner S, Rust M, Dovidio J, Bachman B, Anastasio P. The Contact Hypothesis: The Role of a Common Ingroup Identity on Reducing Intergroup Bias among Majority and Minority Group Members. 1996, 230-260. DOI: 10.4135/9781483327648.n10.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1994
The Contact Hypothesis
Gaertner S, Rust M, Dovidio J, Bachman B, Anastasio P. The Contact Hypothesis. Small Group Research 1994, 25: 224-249. DOI: 10.1177/1046496494252005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive representationsAffective reactionsContact hypothesisCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup biasIdentity modelCooperative interdependenceWeak representationRacial identityEgalitarian normsHigh schoolSurvey studyEqual statusRepresentationBiasSchoolsIngroupFavorabilityAmerican identityThefeaturesHypothesisIdentityStudent bodyDifferent groupsStudents
1993
The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Anastasio P, Bachman B, Rust M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. European Review Of Social Psychology 1993, 4: 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/14792779343000004.Peer-Reviewed Original Research