2024
Validating International Classification of Diseases Code (ICD) 10th Revision Algorithms for Accurate Identification of Pulmonary Embolism
Bikdeli B, Khairani C, Bejjani A, Lo Y, Mahajan S, Caraballo C, Jimenez J, Krishnathasan D, Zarghami M, Rashedi S, Jimenez D, Barco S, Secemsky E, Klok F, Hunsaker A, Aghayev A, Muriel A, Hussain M, Appah-Sampong A, Lu Y, Lin Z, Mojibian H, Aneja S, Khera R, Konstantinides S, Goldhaber S, Wang L, Zhou L, Monreal M, Piazza G, Krumholz H, Investigators P. Validating International Classification of Diseases Code (ICD) 10th Revision Algorithms for Accurate Identification of Pulmonary Embolism. Journal Of Thrombosis And Haemostasis 2024 PMID: 39505153, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDischarge codesInternational ClassificationICD-10Yale New Haven Health SystemPositive predictive valueMass General Brigham hospitalsAccuracy of ICD-10ICD-10 codesPulmonary embolismHealth systemImage codingElectronic databasesF1 scorePre-specified protocolExcellent positive predictive valueIndependent physiciansHighest F1 scoreIdentification of pulmonary embolismAcute pulmonary embolismSecondary codePE codesScoresIdentified PERevised algorithm
2015
Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Planned Readmissions From Claims Data
Horwitz LI, Grady JN, Cohen DB, Lin Z, Volpe M, Ngo CK, Masica AL, Long T, Wang J, Keenan M, Montague J, Suter LG, Ross JS, Drye EE, Krumholz HM, Bernheim SM. Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Planned Readmissions From Claims Data. Journal Of Hospital Medicine 2015, 10: 670-677. PMID: 26149225, PMCID: PMC5459369, DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2416.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSame-hospital readmissionsNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valuePredictive valueReadmission measuresHospital-wide readmission measureGold standard chart reviewAdministrative claims-based algorithmDiagnostic cardiac catheterizationClaims-based algorithmLarge teaching centersAcute care hospitalsSmall community hospitalUnplanned readmissionChart reviewCardiac catheterizationScheduled careSpecificity 96.5Community hospitalReadmissionClaims dataCardiac devicesHealth systemTeaching centerPublic reporting
1997
Validation of a clinical prediction rule for left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial infarction in patients ≥ 65 years old
Krumholz H, Howes C, Murillo J, Vaccarino L, Radford M, Ellerbeck E. Validation of a clinical prediction rule for left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial infarction in patients ≥ 65 years old. The American Journal Of Cardiology 1997, 80: 11-15. PMID: 9205012, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00299-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesConnecticutEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVentricular Function, LeftConceptsLeft ventricular ejection fractionAcute myocardial infarctionClinical prediction ruleVentricular ejection fractionPositive predictive valuePrediction ruleElderly patientsEjection fractionMyocardial infarctionExclusion criteriaPredictive valueEligible elderly patientsRetrospective chart reviewConnecticut cohortChest painBypass surgeryChart reviewDiabetes mellitusMedicare patientsPatientsPilot studyMultivariate modelInfarctionElectrocardiogram interpretationOriginal study