2020
Systematic scoping review identifies heterogeneity in outcomes measured in adolescent depression clinical trials
Mew E, Monsour A, Saeed L, Santos L, Patel S, Courtney D, Watson P, Szatmari P, Offringa M, Monga S, Butcher N. Systematic scoping review identifies heterogeneity in outcomes measured in adolescent depression clinical trials. Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology 2020, 126: 71-79. PMID: 32561367, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOutcome measurement instrumentsOutcome heterogeneityMajor depressive disorder trialsMajor depressive disorderDepressive symptom severityOutcome termsSingle trialDepression clinical trialPrimary outcomeClinical trialsDepressive disorderDepression trialsSymptom severityLife impactStudy designIdentified outcomesTrial resultsTrialsOutcomesIdentifies heterogeneityDescriptive analysisMeasurement instrumentsTherapySeverity
2019
Outcomes reported in randomised clinical trials of major depressive disorder treatments in adolescents: a systematic scoping review protocol
Monsour A, Mew EJ, Szatmari P, Patel S, Saeed L, Offringa M, Butcher NJ. Outcomes reported in randomised clinical trials of major depressive disorder treatments in adolescents: a systematic scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2019, 9: bmjopen-2018-024191. PMID: 30782729, PMCID: PMC6340428, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024191.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdolescent major depressive disorderCore outcome setsMajor depressive disorderClinical trialsMajor depressive disorder treatmentCommon mental health conditionsDepressive disorder treatmentBest treatment practicesMental health conditionsElectronic bibliographic database searchJoanna Briggs InstituteReview methods manualFull-text screeningEfficacy of interventionsSystematic scoping review protocolScoping review protocolSystematic scoping reviewDepressive disorderEligible studiesBibliographic database searchOutcome setsTreatment interventionsDisorder treatmentOutcome selectionRCTs