For decades, malaria researchers have faced an immunologic barrier: recovery from infection does not produce long-lasting, protective immune memory. As Bucala explains, many infections—such as seasonal influenza—leave in their wake immune “memory” that protects the person from reinfection years later. In malaria, that memory response never forms, leaving people vulnerable to reinfection.
“People are infected, treated, and then infected again—repeatedly and over a lifetime,” says Bucala. “If children are lucky enough to survive the first infection, they remain susceptible to reinfection and, in most cases, remain chronically infected. They can never clear the infection, and if cured by antibiotics, they are simply reinfected by the next mosquito bite.”
This challenge has real-world consequences. The first malaria vaccine approved for human use in 2015 provided protection for about half of vaccinated individuals and diminished over time. Newer vaccine candidates have achieved better protection, but the field continues to seek vaccines that are both potent and long-lasting as well as effective against new strains, which evolve quickly and arrive with each rainy season.
Bucala’s team is pursuing a strategy grounded in parasite immunology. Humans have a protein called macrophage migration inhibitory factor, or MIF, that helps regulate the immune system. In the early 2000s, genomics researchers discovered that malaria parasites have their own version of MIF (known as PMIF)—a unique occurrence among the more than 20,000 human genes. In experimental models, Bucala’s team found that a malaria strain engineered without PMIF triggered a completely different immune response: Infected mice developed effective immunity and immunological memory while mice infected with parasites that had PMIF did not.
The mechanism discovered by the Yale laboratory is that PMIF exploits a host inflammatory pathway to eliminate the formation of T cells, immune cells that are essential for long-term immune memory. “Malaria kills because of this subversion of the inflammatory response,” says Bucala.
That insight created the team’s vaccine strategy: Rather than focusing on a pathogen’s structural proteins—the basis for prior vaccine strategies—the new approach targets the immunologic pathway that the parasite evolved over millions of years in order to co-exist with its human host. It is precisely this evolutionarily conserved mechanism that has made it so difficult to achieve protective vaccination against malaria and other parasitic infections.
“We are targeting the mechanism the parasite uses to redirect the immune response for its own survival,” says Bucala. In animal models, the strategy has been compelling: when PMIF is neutralized, “the infected host mounts a fully protective and long-lasting immune response that both eliminates the parasite and prevents reinfection.
“Because PMIF is so necessary for parasites’ survival, they cannot mutate or evolve away from its function, raising hope for long-term protection against the evolution of future strains,” says Bucala.
And evidence suggests PMIF vaccination may protect against infection by entire groups of parasites, either on its own or in combination with current vaccines whose efficacy wanes quickly. This is why the research team will be testing this approach against a different parasite—helminths—in sheep.
“The vaccine target and the conceptual approach are the same as what we’ve been developing for malaria,” says Bucala. “We’re now extending it to helminths.”