2016
Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast
Shepard TG, Shavit AY, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast. Perception 2016, 46: 268-282. PMID: 28024444, PMCID: PMC5944861, DOI: 10.1177/0301006616686099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextExperiment 1Sense modalitiesSensory modalitiesIntensity judgmentsExperiment 4Experiment 2Contextual contrastSuccessive stimuliEvidence of contrastEvidence of assimilationContextual effectsTaste intensityTest sessionsResponse scaleJudgmentsStimuliLoudnessMagnitude estimationTaste perceptionVisual analogueConsistent evidenceTaste stimuliFlavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context
Hallowell ES, Parikh R, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Flavor Identification and Intensity: Effects of Stimulus Context. Chemical Senses 2016, 41: 249-259. PMID: 26830499, PMCID: PMC5006141, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv087.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextSensory eventsSignal detection theoryDifferent sessionsPerceptual spaceFlavor identificationIntensity ratingsOlfactory flavorantsContextual conditionsCitrus componentsDifferent contextsSweet intensityTask of identificationRatingsSessionsContextResponse criteriaStimuliJudgmentsTaskOral mixtureDecision rulesTheory
2015
Response Times to Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence
Shepard TG, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Response Times to Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Role of Congruence. Chemical Senses 2015, 40: 565-575. PMID: 26304508, PMCID: PMC4675834, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv042.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink
Eitan Z, Schupak A, Gotler A, Marks LE. Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink. Experimental Psychology 2014, 61: 273-284. PMID: 24351984, DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000246.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Identification of Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Effects of Linguistic Labeling
Brewer JM, Shavit AY, Shepard TG, Veldhuizen MG, Parikh R, Marks LE. Identification of Gustatory–Olfactory Flavor Mixtures: Effects of Linguistic Labeling. Chemical Senses 2013, 38: 305-313. PMID: 23329730, PMCID: PMC3629875, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs142.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context
Marks LE, Shepard TG, Burger K, Chakwin EM. Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context. Physiology & Behavior 2011, 105: 443-450. PMID: 21930139, PMCID: PMC3225720, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.039.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Post-transient shifts in auditory lateralization: Effects of target level
Arieh Y, Marks L. Post-transient shifts in auditory lateralization: Effects of target level. The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 2010, 127: 1-4. PMID: 20058943, DOI: 10.1121/1.3270393.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2009
Taste Coding after Selective Inhibition by Chlorhexidine
Wang M, Marks L, Frank M. Taste Coding after Selective Inhibition by Chlorhexidine. Chemical Senses 2009, 34: 653-666. PMID: 19703921, PMCID: PMC2745350, DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp047.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTaste of NaClMM chlorhexidineChlorhexidine gluconatePrototypic stimulusMultiple receptorsChlorhexidineBitter stimuliQuinine tastesGustatory systemSalt tasteQuinine hydrochlorideSelective inhibitionTaste codingQuininePartial inhibitionTreatmentSalty tasteStimuliInhibitionMultiple stimuliAcid taste
2007
Memory for curvature of objects: Haptic touch vs. vision
Ittyerah M, Marks L. Memory for curvature of objects: Haptic touch vs. vision. British Journal Of Psychology 2007, 98: 589-610. PMID: 17535462, PMCID: PMC2258210, DOI: 10.1348/000712606x171531.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsShort-term memory paradigmCross-modal performanceShort-term memoryRole of visionRetention intervalMemory paradigmInterpolated taskModality conditionsStimulus objectsCurvature of objectsSpatial processingExperiment 1Experiment 2Delay intervalHaptic touchReliable interactionHaptic informationMemoryPoor performanceVisual performanceTaskInitial stimulusGeneral tendencyStimuliObjectsPosttransient shifts in auditory lateralization
Arieh Y, Marks L. Posttransient shifts in auditory lateralization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2007, 69: 523-528. PMID: 17727105, DOI: 10.3758/bf03193909.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2006
Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat
Pollock R, Carter A, Amir N, Marks L. Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat. Behaviour Research And Therapy 2006, 44: 1739-1756. PMID: 16513082, DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnxiety sensitivityElevated false alarm rateFear-relevant cuesAuditory perceptionThreat signalsAutonomic arousalDetection paradigmAS individualsPanic disorderPanic patientsPanic attacksLow abilityPerceptionTaskIndividualsCardiac stimuliArousalCuesGreater propensityFalse alarm rateBackground noiseFearStimuliAbilityNormal heartbeats
2005
Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L)
Arieh Y, Kelly K, Marks L. Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L). The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 2005, 117: 3381-3384. PMID: 16018440, DOI: 10.1121/1.1898103.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2004
A nonmusical paradigm for identifying absolute pitch possessors
Ross DA, Olson IR, Marks LE, Gore JC. A nonmusical paradigm for identifying absolute pitch possessors. The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 2004, 116: 1793-1799. PMID: 15478446, DOI: 10.1121/1.1758973.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchValid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching
Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko C, Lucchina LA, Marks LE, Snyder DJ, Weiffenbach JM. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiology & Behavior 2004, 82: 109-114. PMID: 15234598, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBrighter noise: Sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation
Odgaard E, Arieh Y, Marks L. Brighter noise: Sensory enhancement of perceived loudness by concurrent visual stimulation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4: 127-132. PMID: 15460919, DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.127.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEffect of endogenous attention on detection of weak gustatory and olfactory flavors
Ashkenazi A, Marks L. Effect of endogenous attention on detection of weak gustatory and olfactory flavors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2004, 66: 596-608. PMID: 15311659, DOI: 10.3758/bf03194904.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2003
Time course of loudness recalibration: Implications for loudness enhancement
Arieh Y, Marks L. Time course of loudness recalibration: Implications for loudness enhancement. The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 2003, 114: 1550-1556. PMID: 14514208, DOI: 10.1121/1.1603768.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRecalibrating the Auditory System: A Speed–Accuracy Analysis of Intensity Perception
Arieh Y, Marks L. Recalibrating the Auditory System: A Speed–Accuracy Analysis of Intensity Perception. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2003, 29: 523-536. PMID: 12848324, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.523.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChoice response timeSpeeded classification paradigmSpeed-accuracy analysisSimple response timeResponse timeAuditory intensityAuditory signalsLoudness perceptionIntensity perceptionDecisional criteriaDifferent sound frequenciesLoudness recalibrationUnderlying representationAuditory systemWeak toneClassification paradigmPerceptionLoudnessRecalibrationMeasure of errorResponse criteriaToneSound intensityError rateStrong tonesCross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias
Odgaard E, Arieh Y, Marks L. Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2003, 65: 123-132. PMID: 12699315, DOI: 10.3758/bf03194789.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2002
Visual Marking: Selective Attention to Asynchronous Temporal Groups
Jiang Y, Chun MM, Marks LE. Visual Marking: Selective Attention to Asynchronous Temporal Groups. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2002, 28: 717-730. PMID: 12075898, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.717.Peer-Reviewed Original Research