2024
The mammary hair of Monodelphis domestica and homology of the mammary pilosebacous unit
Stadtmauer D, Wagner G. The mammary hair of Monodelphis domestica and homology of the mammary pilosebacous unit. Journal Of Morphology 2024, 285: e21769. PMID: 39188032, DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21769.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMultimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence.
Thai J, Sodagari F, Colwell A, Winograd J, Revzin M, Mahmoud H, Mozayan S, Chou S, Destounis S, Butler R. Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence. RadioGraphics 2024, 44: e230070. PMID: 38573814, DOI: 10.1148/rg.230070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTumor recurrencePostoperative evaluation of patientsFlap reconstruction methodsImplant-based reconstructionMultimodal imagingBreast reconstruction techniquesFat graft placementBreast cancer recurrenceTissue flap reconstructionEvaluation of patientsNipple-sparing techniquesTissue donor sitesFlap-based reconstructionNipple-areolar complex reconstructionDiagnostic breast imagingUnique patient populationAutologous tissue flapsAbnormal imaging appearancesBreast cancer screeningMastectomy optionLocal recurrenceOncoplastic surgeryDisease recurrenceFlap reconstructionReconstructed breast
2022
Outcomes of Extended Pedicle Technique vs Free Nipple Graft Reduction Mammoplasty for Patients With Gigantomastia
Talwar AA, Copeland-Halperin LR, Walsh LR, Christopher AN, Cunning J, Broach RB, Baratta MD, Copeland M, Shankaran V, Butler PD. Outcomes of Extended Pedicle Technique vs Free Nipple Graft Reduction Mammoplasty for Patients With Gigantomastia. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2022, 43: np91-np99. PMID: 36161307, DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac258.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFree nipple graftBREAST-Q scoresAesthetic outcomeReduction mammoplastyPropensity score-matched casesTertiary care centerPairs of patientsReduction mammoplasty techniqueMulti-institutional studyBaseline characteristicsAdult patientsClinical outcomesMedical complicationsPostoperative breastPostoperative cellulitisRetrospective studyMammoplasty techniqueNipple graftCare centerInclusion criteriaSurgical experiencePedicle techniquePostoperative photographsGigantomastiaHigh incidenceIntrapartum nipple stimulation therapy for labor induction: a randomized controlled external pilot study of acceptability and feasibility
Stark EL, Athens ZG, Son M. Intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy for labor induction: a randomized controlled external pilot study of acceptability and feasibility. American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2022, 4: 100575. PMID: 35042047, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100575.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsObstetrical care providersExternal pilot studyLabor inductionStimulation therapyOxytocin infusionNipple stimulationPain levelsCare providersPilot studyInitiation of oxytocinPrimary outcome measureElectric breast pumpWeeks of gestationNeonatal intensive careParticipants' pain levelsNon-English speakingEligible womenMedian durationIntervention startMedian timeIntensive careMinutes of stimulationBreast pumpLabor progressOutcome measures
2020
A Three-Step Technique for Optimal Nipple Position in Transgender Chest Masculinization
Ayyala HS, Mukherjee TJ, Le TM, Cohen WA, Luthringer M, Keith JD. A Three-Step Technique for Optimal Nipple Position in Transgender Chest Masculinization. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2020, 40: np619-np625. PMID: 32501483, DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa150.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNipple-areola complexNAC positionAnterior axillary lineMale Nipple-Areola ComplexFree nippleAxillary lineMean Likert scoreSternal notchChest masculinizationPatients' thoughtsPatientsNipple sizeSatisfaction rateAesthetic resultsGender affirmation processVertical thirdsChestTransgender populationPectoralis muscleNipple positionLikert scoresNippleThree-step techniqueAffirmation processMidline
2018
Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Frey JD, Stranix JT, Chiodo MV, Alperovich M, Ahn CY, Allen RJ, Choi M, Karp NS, Levine JP. Evolution in Monitoring of Free Flap Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2018, 141: 1086-1093. PMID: 29659449, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004271.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFree Tissue FlapsHumansMammaplastyMastectomy, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedNipplesPatient SatisfactionPerforator FlapPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, DopplerConceptsNipple-sparing mastectomyFree flap reconstructionSkin paddleFlap reconstructionAutologous reconstructionRevision proceduresMuscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flapFree flap autologous breast reconstructionAutologous free flap reconstructionTransverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flapGreater body mass indexCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELPercentage of flapsProfunda artery perforatorRectus abdominis myocutaneous flapAutologous breast reconstructionBody mass indexInferior epigastric perforatorGreater mean numberMass indexFlap weightMastectomy weightComparing outcomesBreast reconstructionMastectomy reconstructionOncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study
Jakub J, Peled A, Gray R, Greenup R, Kiluk J, Sacchini V, McLaughlin S, Tchou J, Vierkant R, Degnim A, Willey S. Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study. JAMA Surgery 2018, 153: 123-129. PMID: 28903167, PMCID: PMC5838709, DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3422.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProphylactic nipple-sparing mastectomyNipple-sparing mastectomyRisk-reducing mastectomyPrimary breast cancerBRCA mutationsBreast cancerOncologic safetyContralateral risk-reducing mastectomyNew primary breast cancerOccult primary breast cancerCancer risk-reducing strategiesIpsilateral breast cancerNew breast cancersBreast cancer eventsCohort of patientsNipple-sparing mastectomiesPrimary outcome measureBRCA1/2 mutation carriersFree nipple graftSuperior cosmetic outcomesEvidence-based dataHealth care professionalsMulti-institutional studyNipple-areolar complexProphylactic side
2017
Does Smoking History Confer a Higher Risk for Reconstructive Complications in Nipple‐Sparing Mastectomy?
Frey JD, Alperovich M, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS. Does Smoking History Confer a Higher Risk for Reconstructive Complications in Nipple‐Sparing Mastectomy? The Breast Journal 2017, 23: 415-420. PMID: 28097778, DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12760.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPack-year smoking historyNipple-sparing mastectomyComplete NAC necrosisHistory of smokingSmoking historyReconstructive complicationsNAC necrosisHigh riskNipple-areola complex necrosisNew York University Langone Medical CenterPack-year historyMastectomy flap necrosisActive smokersFlap necrosisRisk factorsMedical CenterReconstructive outcomesComplicationsMastectomyNecrosisNonsmokersOutcomesSmokersSmokingPatients
2016
The “Superior Ledge”: a Modification of the Standard Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty to Accentuate Nipple-Areola Complex Projection
Henderson P, Chang M, Taylor E, Weinreb R, Rohde C. The “Superior Ledge”: a Modification of the Standard Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty to Accentuate Nipple-Areola Complex Projection. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2016, 40: 733-738. PMID: 27506647, DOI: 10.1007/s00266-016-0687-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNipple-areola complexNipple retractionReduction mammaplastyEvidence-Based Medicine ratingsMean follow-upSuperomedial pedicle techniqueWound healing complicationsLevel of Evidence VThis journalBreast reduction techniqueLevel of evidencePlastic surgeon's armamentariumEvidence VThis journalExcess breast tissueIntraoperative detailsPostoperative photographsPatient demographicsPedicle techniqueFollow-upMethodsThe techniqueBreast shapeBreast tissueSurgical teamPatientsSurgeon's armamentariumComplications“Breast in a Day”
Choi M, Frey JD, Alperovich M, Levine JP, Karp NS. “Breast in a Day”. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2016, 138: 184e-191e. PMID: 27465178, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002333.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPermanent implant reconstructionNipple-sparing mastectomyMastectomy flap necrosisImplant reconstructionAcellular dermal matrixComplication rateFlap necrosisMajor mastectomy flap necrosisMinor mastectomy flap necrosisDermal matrixImplant sizeCLINICAL QUESTION/LEVELPercent of reconstructionsCommon major complicationPrior radiation therapyGreater complication rateLow complication rateNipple-sparing mastectomiesBody mass indexCommon minor complicationAverage implant sizeMajority of implantsOverall complicationsNipple necrosisMinor complicationsCan Vascular Patterns on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help Predict Skin Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
Bahl M, Pien I, Buretta K, Hwang E, Greenup R, Ghate S, Hollenbeck S. Can Vascular Patterns on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help Predict Skin Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy? Journal Of The American College Of Surgeons 2016, 223: 279-285. PMID: 27182036, DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.045.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNipple-sparing mastectomyNipple-areola complexSkin flap ischemiaBlood supplyFlap ischemiaSingle blood supplyPreoperative magnetic resonance imagingSurgical specimen weightPrevious radiation therapyPreoperative breast MRIDual blood supplyMajority of proceduresMagnetic resonance imagingNSM proceduresPatient demographicsSmoking historySurgical complicationsSurgical factorsSkin necrosisVascular findingsFemale patientsDecreased riskIncision typeSingle institutionMedical records
2015
Oncologic outcomes after nipple‐sparing mastectomy: A single‐institution experience
Frey JD, Alperovich M, Kim JC, Axelrod DM, Shapiro RL, Choi M, Schnabel FR, Karp NS, Guth AA. Oncologic outcomes after nipple‐sparing mastectomy: A single‐institution experience. Journal Of Surgical Oncology 2015, 113: 8-11. PMID: 26628318, DOI: 10.1002/jso.24097.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNipple-sparing mastectomySkin-sparing mastectomyOncologic outcomesLong-term oncologic outcomesAverage patient ageCommon histologic typePercent of patientsLocoregional recurrence rateSingle institution experienceAverage tumor sizeChest wall recurrenceInvasive ductal carcinomaLocoregional recurrencePatient ageHistologic typeDuctal carcinomaRecurrence rateTumor sizeAverage patientPatientsTherapeutic indicationsMastectomyRecurrenceOutcomesComplex recurrenceNipple‐sparing Mastectomy and Sub‐areolar Biopsy: To Freeze or not to Freeze? Evaluating the Role of Sub‐areolar Intraoperative Frozen Section
Alperovich M, Choi M, Karp NS, Singh B, Ayo D, Frey JD, Roses DF, Schnabel FR, Axelrod DM, Shapiro RL, Guth AA. Nipple‐sparing Mastectomy and Sub‐areolar Biopsy: To Freeze or not to Freeze? Evaluating the Role of Sub‐areolar Intraoperative Frozen Section. The Breast Journal 2015, 22: 18-23. PMID: 26510917, DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12517.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNipple-sparing mastectomyIntraoperative frozen sectionNipple-sparing mastectomiesNipple-areolar complexPermanent paraffin sectionsFrozen sectionsParaffin sectionsBreast cancer resectionRecords of patientsFrozen section resultsCancer resectionDuctal carcinomaProphylactic mastectomyResidual pathologyBreast reconstructionPermanent biopsyMastectomyBiopsyReconstructive planningSeparate proceduresResectionPatientsCarcinomaBreastCost Analysis of Intraoperative Subareolar Frozen Section During Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
Alperovich M, Reis SM, Choi M, Karp NS, Frey JD, Chang JB, Axelrod DM, Shapiro RL, Guth AA. Cost Analysis of Intraoperative Subareolar Frozen Section During Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2015, 23: 490-493. PMID: 26438436, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4882-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntraoperative frozen sectionSubareolar biopsyNipple-areolar complexFrozen sectionsOperating roomNipple-sparing mastectomyOccult cancerOperative resectionHealthcare chargesPathology resultsBiopsyPatient recordsFirst cost analysisRoutine useEarly detectionInstitutional frequencyMastectomyBreastCost analysisFinancial chargesEvaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge: What is the Added Diagnostic Value of MRI?
Bahl M, Baker J, Greenup R, Ghate S. Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge: What is the Added Diagnostic Value of MRI? Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2015, 22: 435-441. PMID: 26249144, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4792-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathologic nipple dischargeMagnetic resonance imagingNipple dischargeNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valuePredictive valueDiagnostic valueNegative magnetic resonance imagingSpecificity of MRIBreast magnetic resonance imagingEvaluation of patientsValuable additional diagnostic toolRadiology Breast Imaging ReportingBI-RADS 1Data System 4Detection of malignancyAdditional diagnostic toolBreast Imaging ReportingSonographic workupDuct explorationRetrospective reviewSurgical excisionRadiographic findingsDuctal carcinomaSymptomatic populationDiagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Female Patients With Nipple Discharge.
Bahl M, Baker J, Greenup R, Ghate S. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Female Patients With Nipple Discharge. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2015, 205: 203-8. PMID: 26102400, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13354.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPathologic nipple dischargeNipple dischargeInvasive adenocarcinomaSurgical excisionEvaluation of patientsDetection of DCISNormal sonographic findingsSpecificity of mammographySpecificity of ultrasoundUseful diagnostic toolContribution of ultrasoundBilateral mammographyFemale patientsPathologic featuresRadiologic findingsRetrospective reviewDuctal carcinomaSonographic findingsPathologic resultsStudy populationPatientsRoutine evaluationDiagnostic valueAdenocarcinomaUltrasoundTreatment of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Necrosis Using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Alperovich M, Harmaty M, Chiu ES. Treatment of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Necrosis Using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2015, 135: 1071e-1072e. PMID: 25724049, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000001229.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2014
Management of Positive Sub‐areolar/Nipple Duct Margins in Nipple‐Sparing Mastectomies
Camp M, Coopey S, Tang R, Colwell A, Specht M, Greenup R, Gadd M, Brachtel E, Austen W, Smith B. Management of Positive Sub‐areolar/Nipple Duct Margins in Nipple‐Sparing Mastectomies. The Breast Journal 2014, 20: 402-407. PMID: 24890641, DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12279.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNipple-sparing mastectomyNipple-areola complexPositive marginsNAC specimensCancer-bearing breastsResidual invasive cancerRetrospective chart reviewInvasive lobular carcinomaResidual DCISChart reviewResidual malignancyDuctal carcinomaInvasive cancerLobular carcinomaProphylactic mastectomyDuctal tissueAreola complexTreatment informationMastectomyCarcinomaTissue removalNippleFuture studiesDCISMalignancyReply
Alperovich M, Choi M, Karp NS. Reply. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2014, 133: 716e. PMID: 24776578, DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000126.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchUlnar Mammary Syndrome
Ramirez R, Kozin S. Ulnar Mammary Syndrome. The Journal Of Hand Surgery 2014, 39: 803-805. PMID: 24679913, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.024.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply