2025
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Processing Comparison for Distinguishing True Progression From Pseudoprogression in High-grade Glioma.
Amer A, Ansari S, Krayyem A, Kundu S, Khose S, Pokhylevych H, Calle S, Patel C, Yang Z, Liu H, Johnson J. Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Processing Comparison for Distinguishing True Progression From Pseudoprogression in High-grade Glioma. Journal Of Computer Assisted Tomography 2025 PMID: 39876523, DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001716.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-grade gliomasBlood-brain barrierDCE-MRIPeak contrast enhancementQuantify BBB permeabilityTreatment-related changesFollow-up subjectsKtrans mapsTrue progressionTumor progressionClinical dataConventional MRIPseudoprogressionBBB permeabilityCombined pathologyKtransContrast enhancementT1 enhancementStandard processing methodologyStatistically significant resultsClinical data setsPathologyPatientsGliomaSSS technique
1993
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
Heiken J, Brink J, McClennan B, Sagel S, Forman H, DiCroce J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Radiology 1993, 187: 327-31. PMID: 8475268, DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475268.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContrast medium injection rateOptimal scanning intervalComputed tomographyHepatic enhancementDynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomographyContrast-enhanced computed tomographyBiphasic injection protocolHepatic parenchymal enhancementPeak contrast enhancementBiphasic injectionParenchymal enhancementBiphasic protocolInjection protocolHigher initial flow ratesEnhancement curvesContrast enhancementMost thresholdsEnhancement indexIntervalPatientsPrimary determinantBolusProtocolLiver
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply