2025
Comparison of prognostic accuracy of HCC staging systems in patients undergoing TACE
Kasolowsky V, Gross M, Madoff D, Duncan J, Taddei T, Strazzabosco M, Jaffe A, Chapiro J. Comparison of prognostic accuracy of HCC staging systems in patients undergoing TACE. Clinical Imaging 2025, 120: 110438. PMID: 40049074, DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110438.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOverall survival of patientsBCLC staging systemTransarterial chemoembolizationOverall survivalStaging systemHepatocellular carcinomaStaging systems of hepatocellular carcinomaHepatocellular carcinoma staging systemsRetrospective single center studyKaplan Meier survival analysisInternational Staging SystemSingle center studyLog-rank testTertiary care centerPredicting overall survivalMeier survival analysisConsecutive patientsPrognostic stratificationStudy endpointPrognostic accuracyCenter studyPrognostic powerStratify outcomesMultivariate analysisPatients
2022
Validation of the KELIM score as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer
Piedimonte S, Kim R, Bernardini M, Atenafu E, Clark M, Lheureux S, May T. Validation of the KELIM score as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2022, 167: 417-422. PMID: 37191644, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.10.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsKaplan-Meier survival analysisOutcomes of cytoreductionRetrospective cohort studyDays of chemotherapyCA 125 valuesMeier survival analysisLocal ethics boardCytoreductive outcomeMedian pfsCohort studyInhibitor useTreatment delayFunctional statusBRCA statusInclusion criteriaHigh riskPlatinum sensitivityStage IIIPatientsSurvival analysisEthics BoardHigh gradeSignificant differencesNACTPoly adenosine
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply