2025
Measurement properties of instruments to assess insight in psychosis: A systematic review protocol
Hazan H, Funaro M, Srihari V. Measurement properties of instruments to assess insight in psychosis: A systematic review protocol. PLOS ONE 2025, 20: e0316447. PMID: 39854417, PMCID: PMC11759350, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316447.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMeasurement properties of instrumentsProperties of instrumentsSystematic reviewCOSMIN Risk of Bias checklistRisk of Bias checklistMeasurement propertiesMeasure methodological qualityMeta-Analysis ProtocolsSynthesize current evidenceSystematic review protocolPreferred Reporting ItemsClinical practicePeer-reviewed journalsStrength of evidenceSemi-structured interviewsBias checklistImprove careMental illnessMethodological qualityReporting ItemsPatient awarenessPRISMA-PReview protocolGRADE approachSelf-report
2024
Electrochemotherapy in the Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review
Barbieri P, Posa A, Lancellotta V, Madoff D, Maresca A, Cornacchione P, Tagliaferri L, Iezzi R. Electrochemotherapy in the Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. Current Oncology 2024, 31: 7403-7413. PMID: 39590176, PMCID: PMC11592455, DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31110546.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCRC liver metastasesLiver metastasesColorectal cancerComplete responseOverall survivalProgressive diseaseInclusion criteriaResection of CRC liver metastasesTreatment of CRC liver metastasisColorectal cancer liver metastasesSystematic searches of PubMedFrequent liver metastasesMedian overall survivalSecondary liver cancerFollow-up durationColorectal Liver MetastasesMultiple risk factorsCancer-related mortalitySearch of PubMedECT-related complicationsEvidence qualityLocoregional treatmentSurgical resectionIdentified articlesGRADE approach
2022
Triple-negative breast cancer prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hercules SM, Alnajar M, Chen C, Mladjenovic SM, Shipeolu BA, Perkovic O, Pond GR, Mbuagbaw L, Blenman KR, Daniel JM. Triple-negative breast cancer prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022, 12: e055735. PMID: 35623750, PMCID: PMC9150263, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055735.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTNBC frequencySystematic reviewReceptor statusAggressive triple-negative breast cancer subtypeTriple-negative breast cancer subtypeER/PR statusASCO/CAP guidelinesBreast cancer tissue samplesCertainty of evidenceInverse variance methodRisk of biasBreast cancer prevalenceBreast cancer subtypesAfrican Journals OnlineCancer tissue samplesWeb of ScienceRecommendations AssessmentGRADE approachPR statusCAP guidelinesEligible participantsSELECTING STUDIESHER2 statusCancer prevalenceModified assessment tool
2021
Continuous glucose monitoring for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
Galderisi A, Trevisanuto D, Russo C, Hall R, Bruschettini M. Continuous glucose monitoring for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews 2021, 2021: cd013309. PMID: 34931697, PMCID: PMC8690212, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013309.pub3.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsRisk of hypoglycaemiaUse of CGMContinuous glucose monitoringPreterm infantsIntermittent modalitiesRisk ratioEffects of CGMLong-term neurodevelopmental impairmentGlucose monitoringEfficacy of CGMCare Group (EPOC) criteriaPreterm infants 1Cochrane Effective PracticePrevention of morbidityClinical trials databasesLong-term outcomesConfidence intervalsPreterm infant mortalitySafety of CGMImprecision of estimatesFixed-effects modelAdverse neurodevelopmentGRADE approachNeurodevelopmental outcomesDATA COLLECTIONAdjuvant Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Concluded Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Riaz I, Siddiqi R, Islam M, He H, Riaz A, Asghar N, Naqvi S, Warner J, Murad M, Kohli M. Adjuvant Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Concluded Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2021, 5: 588-599. PMID: 34043431, DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitorsTyrosine kinase inhibitorsRenal cell carcinomaTrial sequential analysisCell carcinomaTKI monotherapyClinical trialsHigh-risk renal cell carcinomaMultiple large clinical trialsKinase inhibitorsLiving Systematic ReviewRandomized phase 2High-risk patientsCertainty of evidenceLarge clinical trialsKey clinical outcomesAdverse event riskLack of benefitOS benefitPROTECT trialGRADE approachClinical outcomesRandomized trialsCancer recurrenceSTUDY SELECTIONACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding
Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. The American Journal Of Gastroenterology 2021, 116: 899-917. PMID: 33929377, DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsUpper gastrointestinal bleedingEndoscopic therapyGastrointestinal bleedingHigh-dose proton pump inhibitor therapyOvert upper gastrointestinal bleedingOral proton pump inhibitorsProton pump inhibitor therapyRed blood cell transfusionAbsolute ethanol injectionWeeks of therapyBlood cell transfusionLow-quality evidenceLow-risk patientsManagement of patientsProton pump inhibitorsArgon plasma coagulationActive spurtingErythromycin infusionTC-325Cell transfusionRecurrent bleedingRecurrent ulcersUlcer bleedingEndoscopic hemostasisGRADE approach
2020
Continuous glucose monitoring for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
Galderisi A, Bruschettini M, Russo C, Hall R, Trevisanuto D. Continuous glucose monitoring for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews 2020, 12: cd013309. PMID: 33348448, PMCID: PMC8092644, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013309.pub2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPreterm infantsContinuous glucose monitoringGlycemic measuresRisk ratioIntermittent modalitiesLong-term neurodevelopmental impairmentGlucose monitoringCare Group (EPOC) criteriaCochrane Central RegisterCochrane Effective PracticePrevention of morbidityQuasi-randomized trialStandard search strategyClinical trials databasesLong-term outcomesPreterm infant mortalityAllied Health LiteratureUse of CGMImprecision of estimatesFixed-effects modelCochrane NeonatalAdverse neurodevelopmentCentral RegisterGRADE approachControlled TrialsDiagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline
Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, Myers JL, Kreuter M, Vasakova M, Bargagli E, Chung JH, Collins BF, Bendstrup E, Chami HA, Chua AT, Corte TJ, Dalphin JC, Danoff SK, Diaz-Mendoza J, Duggal A, Egashira R, Ewing T, Gulati M, Inoue Y, Jenkins AR, Johannson KA, Johkoh T, Tamae-Kakazu M, Kitaichi M, Knight SL, Koschel D, Lederer DJ, Mageto Y, Maier LA, Matiz C, Morell F, Nicholson AG, Patolia S, Pereira CA, Renzoni EA, Salisbury ML, Selman M, Walsh SLF, Wuyts WA, Wilson KC. Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. American Journal Of Respiratory And Critical Care Medicine 2020, 202: e36-e69. PMID: 32706311, PMCID: PMC7397797, DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202005-2032st.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSurgical lung biopsyHypersensitivity pneumonitisLung biopsyGuidelines CommitteeDiagnosis of HPFibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitisNonfibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitisTransbronchial lung biopsyTransbronchial lung cryobiopsyInterstitial lung diseaseJapanese Respiratory SocietyBronchoalveolar lavage fluidClinical practice guidelinesAmerican Thoracic SocietyPotential exposureGRADE approachLung cryobiopsyLavage fluidSerum IgGLung diseasePathological featuresThorough historyRespiratory SocietyThoracic SocietyPractice guidelines
2019
Pre-arrest and intra-arrest prognostic factors associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis
Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Taljaard M, Vaillancourt C, Rowan KM, Harrison DA, Nolan JP, Kyeremanteng K, McIsaac DI, Guyatt GH, Perry JJ. Pre-arrest and intra-arrest prognostic factors associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis. The BMJ 2019, 367: l6373. PMID: 31801749, PMCID: PMC6891802, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6373.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHospital cardiac arrestCardiac arrestPrognostic factorsSystematic reviewReduced oddsPrimary analysisInitial shockable rhythmIntra-arrest factorsPre-arrest factorsHigh-certainty evidenceChronic kidney diseaseDuration of resuscitationRisk of biasEnglish-language studiesWeb of ScienceActive malignancyCertainty evidenceCohort studyGRADE approachOdds of survivalCochrane DatabaseMale sexKidney diseaseShockable rhythmRelevant confounders
2018
Screening for Lung Cancer CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Mazzone PJ, Silvestri GA, Patel S, Kanne JP, Kinsinger LS, Wiener RS, Hoo G, Detterbeck FC. Screening for Lung Cancer CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. CHEST Journal 2018, 153: 954-985. PMID: 29374513, DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow-dose CT screeningLow-dose chest CTCT screeningChest CTClinical questionsNational Lung Screening TrialEvidence baseScreen-detected findingsLung cancer resultsChest CT screeningScreening-eligible patientsKey clinical questionsStandard of careImportant clinical questionsSystematic literature reviewExpert Panel ReportLow-dose CTCHEST GuidelineGRADE approachCessation interventionsCochrane LibraryLiterature reviewLung cancerPICO questionScreening Trial
2016
Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review
Hall A, Richmond H, Copsey B, Hansen Z, Williamson E, Jones G, Fordham B, Cooper Z, Lamb S. Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review. Disability And Rehabilitation 2016, 40: 1-9. PMID: 27871193, DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236155.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow back painHigh-quality evidenceBack painQuality of lifeCB interventionProvider trainingCognitive-behavioral interventionsPatient outcomesDifferent health care professionalsOutcomes of disabilityTrial of patientsModerate-quality evidenceAdditional trainingPhysical therapy settingHealth care professionalsExercise interventionGRADE approachIntervention reportingPsychosocial symptomsTreatment benefitLong-term effectsPainCare professionalsShort-term benefitsTreatment approaches
2011
Framing of health information messages
Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Costiniuk C, Blank D, Schünemann H. Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews 2011, cd006777. PMID: 22161408, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006777.pub2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandardized mean differenceHealth professionalsPre-planned subgroup analysisScreening testCochrane Central RegisterModerate-quality evidenceRelated systematic reviewsCross-over studyQuality of evidenceHealth information messagesChance of mortalityCentral RegisterGRADE approachControlled TrialsPrimary outcomeReview authorsDATA COLLECTIONAdverse outcomesLanguage restrictionsQuality evidenceSubgroup analysisReference listsSystematic reviewChances of survivalMean differenceUsing alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions
Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Costiniuk C, Blank D, Schünemann H. Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews 2011, 2012: cd006776. PMID: 21412897, PMCID: PMC6464912, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006776.pub2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPolicy makersAbsolute risk reductionRelative risk reductionStatistical presentationStandardized mean differenceHigh quality comparisonsRisk reductionHealth professionalsMakersSensitivity analysisConsumersCochrane Central RegisterCross-over studyQuality of evidenceRisk of biasStatistical informationCentral RegisterGRADE approachControlled TrialsDATA COLLECTIONEvidence-based practiceSurrogate outcomesOvid MEDLINEOutcome effectsReference lists
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply