2025
Cross‐Cultural Validation of the Binge Eating Disorder Screener‐7 (BEDS‐7) Across 42 Countries
Gewirtz‐Meydan A, Spivak‐Lavi Z, Kraus S, Nagy L, Koós M, Demetrovics Z, Potenza M, Ballester‐Arnal R, Batthyány D, Bergeron S, Billieux J, Briken P, Burkauskas J, Cárdenas‐López G, Carvalho J, Castro‐Calvo J, Chen L, Ciocca G, Corazza O, Csako R, Fernandez D, Fernandez E, Fujiwara H, Fuss J, Gabrhelík R, Gjoneska B, Gola M, Grubbs J, Hashim H, Islam S, Ismail M, Jiménez‐Martínez M, Jurin T, Kalina O, Klein V, Költő A, Lee C, Lee S, Lewczuk K, Lin C, Lochner C, López‐Alvarado S, Lukavská K, Mayta‐Tristán P, Miller D, Orosová O, Orosz G, Team S, Chang H, Park K, Ponce F, Quintana G, Garzola G, Ramos‐Diaz J, Rigaud K, Rousseau A, De Tubino Scanavino M, Schulmeyer M, Sharan P, Shibata M, Shoib, Sigre‐Leirós V, Sniewski L, Spasovski O, Steibliene V, Stein D, Strizek J, Ünsal B, Vaillancourt‐Morel M, Van Hout M, Bőthe B. Cross‐Cultural Validation of the Binge Eating Disorder Screener‐7 (BEDS‐7) Across 42 Countries. International Journal Of Eating Disorders 2025, 58: 926-938. PMID: 40040591, PMCID: PMC12067514, DOI: 10.1002/eat.24365.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBinge-eating disorderTests of measurement invarianceDiverse community sampleBinge-eating disorder symptomsCross-sectional online studyMeasures of sexualityConfirmatory factor analysisCross-cultural validityPrimary care settingSexual orientationBED symptomsSexual orientation groupsCommunity sampleFactorial invarianceItem interceptsResidual invarianceBEDS-7Measurement invarianceSubstance useDiverse cultural contextsAdequate reliabilityCriterion validityModerate criterion validityMental healthOnline study
2024
Adaptation and validation of the French version of empathy questionnaire in preschoolers
Simon P, Houssa M, Barbot B, Nader‐Grosbois N. Adaptation and validation of the French version of empathy questionnaire in preschoolers. Social Development 2024, 33 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12729.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProsocial actionsEmotion contagionEmpathy QuestionnaireEmpathy scoresSocial interactionAffective empathy scoresGriffith Empathy MeasureCognitive empathy scoresEmotion regulation scoresTheory of mindEmotion Regulation ChecklistSocio-emotional skillsThree-factor structureFrench versionGood psychometric qualitiesMind InventoryConcurrent criterion validityEmpathy measuresRegulation scoresDysregulation scoresAction ScalePreschool ageDevelopmental disordersPsychometric qualitiesCriterion validity
2022
Three prominent self-report risk measures show unique and overlapping utility in characterizing those at clinical high-risk for psychosis
Williams TF, Powers AR, Ellman LM, Corlett PR, Strauss GP, Schiffman J, Waltz JA, Silverstein SM, Woods SW, Walker EF, Gold JM, Mittal VA. Three prominent self-report risk measures show unique and overlapping utility in characterizing those at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 2022, 244: 58-65. PMID: 35597134, PMCID: PMC9829103, DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.05.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProdromal Questionnaire-BriefPositive symptomsSelf-report questionnairesSpecific positive symptomsStructured Clinical InterviewClinical high riskCriterion validityHealthy controlsSpecific symptomsHigh riskDiscriminant validityPsychosis symptomsClinical InterviewCHR individualsStrong convergent validitySymptomsPsychosis riskNeuropsychological testsConsistent significant correlationLimited specificitySignificant correlationConvergent validityPsychosisConstruct validityQuestionnaire
2019
A Measure to Assess Perceptions and Knowledge About Electroconvulsive Therapy: Development and Psychometric Properties.
Tsai J, Huang M, Wilkinson ST, Edelen C, Rosenheck RA, Holtzheimer PE. A Measure to Assess Perceptions and Knowledge About Electroconvulsive Therapy: Development and Psychometric Properties. Journal Of Ect 2019, 36: e1-e6. PMID: 31192871, DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000000609.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsElectroconvulsive therapyKnowledge subscale scoresKnowledge of ECTGood construct validityBrain damageSevere depressionUS adultsSystematic reviewInternal consistency reliabilityMemory lossRapid treatmentSubscale scoresScientific evidenceContent validityCriterion validityKnowledge subscaleTherapyConsistency reliabilityConstruct validityPsychometric propertiesDepressionNational sampleSubscalesMechanical Turk platformTreatment
2013
Perceived Parental Reactions to Adolescent Distress: development and validation of a brief measure
Barbot B, Heinz SL, Luthar SS. Perceived Parental Reactions to Adolescent Distress: development and validation of a brief measure. Attachment & Human Development 2013, 16: 1-21. PMID: 23777451, PMCID: PMC3812372, DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2013.804328.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdolescent distressParental reactionsBrief self-report measureAdolescent development literatureSelf-report measuresConditions of distressTimes of distressRobust psychometric propertiesAttachment figuresIndividual differencesSelf-FocusAdolescents' perceptionsHigh school studentsBrief measureParental responsesPsychometric propertiesCriterion validityDeliberate distancingDistressSchool studentsDevelopment literaturePerceptionAdolescenceMeasuresAdolescentsDevelopment of the Therapist Empathy Scale
Decker SE, Nich C, Carroll KM, Martino S. Development of the Therapist Empathy Scale. Behavioural And Cognitive Psychotherapy 2013, 42: 339-354. PMID: 23481373, PMCID: PMC3748263, DOI: 10.1017/s1352465813000039.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTherapist empathyEmpathy ScaleMotivational interviewingInternal consistencyDiscriminant validityMI-inconsistent behaviorsConfirmatory factor analysisSingle-factor solutionDifferent psychotherapy approachesInter-rater reliabilityTraining trialsPsychotherapy approachesWatson's workConvergent validityEmpathyExcellent inter-rater reliabilityObserver rating scaleCompetence scoresCriterion validityTES scoresClient outcomesClient sessionsFactor analysisNonsignificant correlationRating Scale
2012
Psychometric evaluation of the Timeline Followback for Exercise among college students
Panza GA, Weinstock J, Ash GI, Pescatello LS. Psychometric evaluation of the Timeline Followback for Exercise among college students. Psychology Of Sport And Exercise 2012, 13: 779-788. PMID: 22844226, PMCID: PMC3403727, DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.06.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCollege alumnus questionnaireType of exerciseTest-retest reliabilityExercise frequencyTimeline FollowbackPearson r correlationsValidity of frequencyExercise typeR correlationsAdequate test-retest reliabilityPhysical fitness batteryRetrospective questionnaireModerate kappaPsychometric evaluationFitness batteryTLFBKappa statisticsCriterion validityConvergent validityExercisePsychometric propertiesQuestionnaireSeparate studiesPredictive validityParticipants
2009
Face, Content, and Construct Validity of dV-Trainer, a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Robotic Surgery
Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino JA, Moinzadeh A. Face, Content, and Construct Validity of dV-Trainer, a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Robotic Surgery. Urology 2009, 73: 1288-1292. PMID: 19362352, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.044.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDa Vinci Surgical SystemVinci Surgical SystemRobotic surgeryVirtual reality simulatorSurgical systemDa Vinci consoleInstitutional review boardReality simulatorRobotic casesExperienced surgeonsInstrument collisionsReview boardTotal scoreSurgeonsPredictive criterion validityNovel virtual reality simulatorRobotic surgeonsResidency curriculumSurgeryCriterion validityConstruct validitySubjectsDV-TrainerPresent studyNovice group
2008
Validity of the Latin American and Caribbean Household Food Security Scale (ELCSA) in South Haiti
Perez‐Escamilla R, Dessalines M, Finnigan M, Hromi‐Fiedler A, Pachón H. Validity of the Latin American and Caribbean Household Food Security Scale (ELCSA) in South Haiti. The FASEB Journal 2008, 22: 871.3-871.3. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.22.1_supplement.871.3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchFood insecurePoor dietary qualityHousehold food insecureHousehold Food Security ScaleFood secure householdsIndex childResponse prevalenceFood Security ScaleDietary qualityRural HaitiGood healthELCSAConvenience sampleFemale-headed householdsChild hungerCronbach's alphaCriterion validitySecure householdsValid toolMalariaSocial unacceptabilityChildrenMonthsWomenLand ownership
1996
Criterion Validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3)
SCHWAB-STONE M, SHAFFER D, DULCAN M, JENSEN P, FISHER P, BIRD H, GOODMAN S, LAHEY B, LICHTMAN J, CANINO G, RUBIO-STIPEC M, RAE D. Criterion Validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). Journal Of The American Academy Of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 1996, 35: 878-888. PMID: 8768347, DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199607000-00013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNIMH Diagnostic Interview ScheduleChildren Version 2.3Diagnostic Interview ScheduleAdolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) StudyClinician symptom ratingsEpidemiology of ChildPresence of symptomsMental Disorders StudyNumber of diagnosesCriterion validityInterview scheduleSpecific diagnostic areasNIMH MethodsParent-youth pairsDiagnostic areasDiagnostic agreementSymptom ratingsSymptom reportsPrimary caregiversDiagnosisComparison of discScreen negativesDisorders StudyGood validityValidity study
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply