2011
Early Adverse Results with Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective Cohort Comparison to Total Knee Arthroplasty
Morrison T, Nyce J, Macaulay W, Geller J. Early Adverse Results with Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective Cohort Comparison to Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal Of Arthroplasty 2011, 26: 35-39. PMID: 21704484, DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTotal knee arthroplastyBicompartmental knee arthroplastySignificantly less painEligibility criteriaGrade 2 OAEarly postoperative periodProspective cohort studyBody mass indexKnee arthroplastyComplication rateLess painShort Form-12Preoperative statusPostoperative periodMass indexCohort studyFunctional outcomesStiffness scoresPatientsCohortCohort comparisonLateral compartmentCruciate ligamentPhysical function
2009
Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures
Geller J, Saifi C, Morrison T, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. International Orthopaedics 2009, 34: 719-722. PMID: 19618186, PMCID: PMC2903170, DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTip-apex distanceScrew cut-outSliding hip screwHip fractureFracture unionHip screwIT fracturesFollow-upTip apex distance valueLag screw cut-outElderly hip fracturesIntertrochanteric (ITAdequate follow-upCut-out failureStatistically significant differenceIntramedullary (IMRetrospective studyClinical outcomesImplant failureRate of revisionPatientsIntramedullary deviceSignificant differenceFunctional statusAccurate predictor
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply