2025
Imetelstat in myeloid malignancies: current data and future directions
Bidikian A, Bewersdorf J, Kewan T, Podoltsev N, Stahl M, Zeidan A. Imetelstat in myeloid malignancies: current data and future directions. Expert Review Of Anticancer Therapy 2025, ahead-of-print: 1-12. PMID: 40116730, DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2482721.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMyelodysplastic syndromeLR-MDSClinical trialsPotential disease-modifying propertiesLow-risk myelodysplastic syndromesElevated liver enzymesLR-MDS patientsTreat myelodysplastic syndromeSearch of PubMedTransfusion independenceEssential thrombocythemiaInfusion reactionsMyeloid malignanciesDisease-modifying propertiesCombination therapySurvival benefitEffective telomerase inhibitorImetelstatTelomerase reactivationPatient populationLiver enzymesMyelofibrosisCancer cellsMalignancyConference abstractsSelinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor treatment-naĂŻve myelofibrosis: SENTRY Phase 3 study design
Mascarenhas J, Maher K, Rampal R, Bose P, Podoltsev N, Hong J, Chai Y, Kye S, Method M, Harrison C, . Selinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor treatment-naĂŻve myelofibrosis: SENTRY Phase 3 study design. Future Oncology 2025, 21: 807-813. PMID: 39911057, PMCID: PMC11916360, DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2461393.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsJAK inhibitorsNo dose limiting toxicitiesDose-limiting toxicityAbsolute mean changeSpleen volume reductionPlacebo-controlled studyBaseline to weekTreatment of patientsDose expansionDose escalationLimiting toxicitiesDouble-blindPrimary endpointPhase 3 study designXPO1 inhibitorsMean changeRuxolitinibPatientsSelinexorVolume reductionDosePhase 3InhibitorsJAKMyelofibrosis
2021
Patterns of Care for Older Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Population-based Study
Meckstroth S, Wang R, Ma X, Podoltsev N. Patterns of Care for Older Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Population-based Study. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2021, 21: e551-e558. PMID: 33648884, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.01.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPatterns of careOlder patientsEnd Results-Medicare databaseJAK inhibitor eraHigh-risk patientsPopulation-based studyUse of ruxolitinibJAK inhibitor ruxolitinibUnited States FoodRuxolitinib approvalMedian ageMedian timeTreatment patternsD claimsCurrent treatmentInhibitor ruxolitinibPatientsBetter outcomesClinical experienceDrug AdministrationMedicare Part BMyelofibrosisRuxolitinibStates FoodNew drugs
2015
Historical views, conventional approaches, and evolving management strategies for myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Stein BL, Gotlib J, Arcasoy M, Nguyen MH, Shah N, Moliterno A, Jamieson C, Pollyea DA, Scott B, Wadleigh M, Levine R, Komrokji R, Klisovic R, Gundabolu K, Kropf P, Wetzler M, Oh ST, Ribeiro R, Paschal R, Mohan S, Podoltsev N, Prchal J, Talpaz M, Snyder D, Verstovsek S, Mesa RA. Historical views, conventional approaches, and evolving management strategies for myeloproliferative neoplasms. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2015, 13: 424-34. PMID: 25870379, PMCID: PMC8161684, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0058.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyeloproliferative neoplasmsClassical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasmsJAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinibPrognostic scoring systemHematologists/oncologistsPhiladelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasmsJAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinibQuality of lifeCytoreductive agentsSymptom burdenVascular eventsInhibitor ruxolitinibPolycythemia veraDiagnostic criteriaEssential thrombocythemiaDisease pathogenesisFirst treatmentScoring systemNovel therapeuticsMyelofibrosisCALR mutationsMolecular diagnosisNeoplasms
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply