2024
Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Bailey J, Rajwa P, Seibert T, Loeb S, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 43: 193.e19-193.e26. PMID: 39706698, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADS 5 lesionsGG1 prostate cancerPI-RADSGG1 diseaseFusion biopsyRadical prostatectomyGleason gradeProstate cancerActive surveillanceGrade Group 1 prostate cancerSingle-institution retrospective analysisOptimal management of patientsMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsyLong-term outcome dataProstate Imaging ReportingMultivariate modelGenomic classifier scoresManagement of patientsPrimary study outcomeAssociated with upgradingMulti-institutional dataGleason upgradingTumor upgradingSurveillance biopsiesProstate MRIRISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade disease
2021
MP40-13 WHEN IS A SEMINOMA NOT A SEMINOMA? THE INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TESTICULAR SEMINOMA WITH DISCORDANT ELEVATED SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN
Fero K, Lec P, Sharma V, Lenis A, Low J, Litwin M, Leapman M, Chamie K. MP40-13 WHEN IS A SEMINOMA NOT A SEMINOMA? THE INCIDENCE, RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TESTICULAR SEMINOMA WITH DISCORDANT ELEVATED SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN. Journal Of Urology 2021, 206: e719-e719. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002055.13.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
National trends in the management of patients with positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Ghabili K, Nguyen K, Hsiang W, Syed J, Suarez-Sarmiento A, Shuch B, Park H, Yu J, Leapman M. National trends in the management of patients with positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 111-111. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdjuvant radiation therapyAndrogen deprivation therapyPositive surgical marginsNational Cancer DatabaseAdjuvant therapyRadical prostatectomyRadiation therapyProstate cancerPathologic featuresSurgical marginsAddition of ADTAdjuvant androgen deprivation therapyStudy periodPre-treatment PSAPrimary definitive treatmentMajority of patientsManagement of patientsGleason grade groupCourse of managementOptimal management approachNon-academic facilitiesLogistic regression modelsBinary logistic regression modelAnalysis menDeprivation therapy
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply