2025
Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2025 Update on Diagnosis, Risk‐Stratification, and Management
Shimony S, Stahl M, Stone R. Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2025 Update on Diagnosis, Risk‐Stratification, and Management. American Journal Of Hematology 2025, 100: 860-891. PMID: 39936576, PMCID: PMC11966364, DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27625.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaTherapeutic management of acute myeloid leukemiaManagement of acute myeloid leukemiaEuropean Leukemia NetworkStem cell cancerTherapeutic decision-makingImmature leukemia cellsExtra-medullary tissuesMRD findingsPrognostic factorsCell cancerTherapeutic algorithmRisk classification algorithmApproved therapiesMyeloid leukemiaResponse assessmentRisk stratificationBone marrowTherapeutic managementMonitoring of disease statusPathophysiological understandingDisease characteristicsMolecular findingsTherapeutic approachesDisease status
2023
When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS?
Kewan T, Bewersdorf J, Gurnari C, Xie Z, Stahl M, Zeidan A. When to use which molecular prognostic scoring system in the management of patients with MDS? Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology 2023, 36: 101517. PMID: 38092484, DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101517.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemPrognostic scoring systemAcute myeloid leukemiaScoring systemRisk stratificationRecurrent molecular alterationsHigh-risk patientsAppropriate risk stratificationManagement of patientsRecurrent genetic mutationsIntensive therapyMyeloid leukemiaTreatment strategiesPrognostic toolDisease pathogenesisMolecular alterationsHematopoietic cancersClinical decisionHeterogeneous groupGenetic mutationsNext-generation sequencingPrognostic systemPatientsVariable propensitySubsequent revisionClassification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)
Stahl M, Bewersdorf J, Xie Z, Porta M, Komrokji R, Xu M, Abdel-Wahab O, Taylor J, Steensma D, Starczynowski D, Sekeres M, Sanz G, Sallman D, Roboz G, Platzbecker U, Patnaik M, Padron E, Odenike O, Nimer S, Nazha A, Majeti R, Loghavi S, Little R, List A, Kim T, Hourigan C, Hasserjian R, Halene S, Griffiths E, Gore S, Greenberg P, Figueroa M, Fenaux P, Efficace F, DeZern A, Daver N, Churpek J, Carraway H, Buckstein R, Brunner A, Boultwood J, Borate U, Bejar R, Bennett J, Wei A, Santini V, Savona M, Zeidan A. Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS). Blood Reviews 2023, 62: 101128. PMID: 37704469, DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101128.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsInternational consensus classificationResponse assessmentWorld Health Organization classificationPatient-centered careRisk assessment toolClinical outcomesRisk stratificationOrganization classificationCentered careTherapeutic benefitTherapeutic outcomesConsensus classificationResponse criteriaInternational ConsortiumNeoplasmsLife assessmentAssessment toolOutcomesReportAssessmentPrognosticationCareAcute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management
Shimony S, Stahl M, Stone R. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management. American Journal Of Hematology 2023, 98: 502-526. PMID: 36594187, DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26822.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaTherapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemiaPatient acute myeloid leukemiaInternational Consensus ClassificationMalignant myeloid cellsStem cell cancerTherapeutic decision makingMarrow stem cellsCell cancerTherapeutic algorithmMyeloid leukemiaMyeloid cellsRisk stratificationWHO systemTherapeutic complexMutation profilesDisease characteristicsMolecular findingsConsensus classificationTherapeutic landscapeStem cellsRisk classificationLeukemiaIntegration of molecular analysisTrial results
2022
Prognostication in myelodysplastic syndromes (neoplasms): Molecular risk stratification finally coming of age
Xie Z, Chen E, Stahl M, Zeidan A. Prognostication in myelodysplastic syndromes (neoplasms): Molecular risk stratification finally coming of age. Blood Reviews 2022, 59: 101033. PMID: 36357283, DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2022.101033.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromePrognostic modelManagement of MDSInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemMolecular prognostic modelPrognostic scoring systemMolecular risk stratificationHeterogeneous clinical outcomesBone marrow failure disordersMarrow failure disordersRevised IPSSClinical outcomesRisk prognosticationRisk stratificationTraditional risk modelsScoring systemMDS pathobiology
2020
Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey
Pine AB, Chokr N, Stahl M, Steensma DP, Sekeres MA, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Stone RM, Greenberg PL, Bejar R, Bewersdorf JP, Gore SD, Zeidan AM. Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2020, 61: 1455-1464. PMID: 32026740, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1723013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeRisk stratificationMolecular profilingNext-generation sequencingWeb-based surveyRole of NGSManagement of patientsUtility of NGSEvidence-based guidelinesHealth care providersLarge web-based surveyMDS patientsPractice patternsTreatment decisionsCare providersResponse assessmentProviders' beliefsPatientsInstitutional guidelinesGene mutationsDiagnosisSyndromeTesting logisticsInterpretation of resultsWide variation
2018
Wide Variation in Use and Interpretation of Gene Mutation Profiling Panels Among Health Care Providers of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Results of a Large Web-Based Survey
Pine A, Chokr N, Stahl M, Steensma D, Sekeres M, Litzow M, Luger S, Stone R, Greenberg P, Bejar R, Gore S, Zeidan A. Wide Variation in Use and Interpretation of Gene Mutation Profiling Panels Among Health Care Providers of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Results of a Large Web-Based Survey. Blood 2018, 132: 1825. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-113888.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGene mutation profilingSouthwest Oncology GroupMyelodysplastic syndromeRisk stratificationHealth care providersMutation profilingOncology GroupMDS patientsClinical trialsCare providersWeb-based surveyConsensus evidence-based guidelinesInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupGene panelAdvisory CommitteeConventional prognostic modelsThird of respondersHigh-risk patientsCooperative Oncology GroupPrognostic scoring systemRisk stratification toolManagement of patientsStem cell transplantEvidence-based guidelines
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply