2004
Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching
Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko C, Lucchina LA, Marks LE, Snyder DJ, Weiffenbach JM. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiology & Behavior 2004, 82: 109-114. PMID: 15234598, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.033.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1999
study of taste perception
Hettinger T, Gent J, Marks L, Frank M. study of taste perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1999, 61: 1510-1521. PMID: 10598466, DOI: 10.3758/bf03213114.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1998
A Multimodal Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Aging
Stevens J, Cruz L, Marks L, Lakatos S. A Multimodal Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Aging. The Journals Of Gerontology Series B 1998, 53B: p263-p272. PMID: 9679518, DOI: 10.1093/geronb/53b.4.p263.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsWechsler Logical Memory TestLogical memory testAge-related capacityPicture Naming TestIndividual modalitiesMemory testForced-choice detectionNaming TestSensory tasksDetection taskSame taskMultimodal assessmentAge effectsTaskYoung subjectsHearingThreshold scoreScoresHigh-frequency hearingAverage scoreElderly subjectsLarge effectSame subjectsVibrotactionLow-frequency hearing
1992
Effects of context on sweet and bitter tastes: Unrelated to sensitivity to PROP (6-npropylthiouracil)
Rankin K, Marks L. Effects of context on sweet and bitter tastes: Unrelated to sensitivity to PROP (6-npropylthiouracil). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1992, 52: 479-486. PMID: 1437480, DOI: 10.3758/bf03206709.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1991
Reliability of magnitude matching
Marks L. Reliability of magnitude matching. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1991, 49: 31-37. PMID: 2011450, DOI: 10.3758/bf03211613.Peer-Reviewed Original Research