2016
Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast
Shepard TG, Shavit AY, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast. Perception 2016, 46: 268-282. PMID: 28024444, PMCID: PMC5944861, DOI: 10.1177/0301006616686099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextExperiment 1Sense modalitiesSensory modalitiesIntensity judgmentsExperiment 4Experiment 2Contextual contrastSuccessive stimuliEvidence of contrastEvidence of assimilationContextual effectsTaste intensityTest sessionsResponse scaleJudgmentsStimuliLoudnessMagnitude estimationTaste perceptionVisual analogueConsistent evidenceTaste stimuli
2010
Measurement of Loudness, Part II: Context Effects
Arieh Y, Marks L. Measurement of Loudness, Part II: Context Effects. Springer Handbook Of Auditory Research 2010, 37: 57-87. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1_3.Chapters
2006
Differential effects of stimulus context in sensory processing
Marks L, Arieh Y. Differential effects of stimulus context in sensory processing. European Review Of Applied Psychology 2006, 56: 213-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2005.09.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDifferential context effectsPerceptual processingPerceptual processesStimulus contextContext effectsDifferential effectsSensory processingHaptic touchBasic research settingsDifferent sound frequenciesDifferent intensity levelsSpatial orientationStimuliResearch settingsSensory measurementsLength of lineDifferent spatial orientationsProcessingStrong stimulusPerceptionContextSound frequencyIntensity levelsLoudnessHearing
2005
Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L)
Arieh Y, Kelly K, Marks L. Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L). The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 2005, 117: 3381-3384. PMID: 16018440, DOI: 10.1121/1.1898103.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2003
Recalibrating the Auditory System: A Speed–Accuracy Analysis of Intensity Perception
Arieh Y, Marks L. Recalibrating the Auditory System: A Speed–Accuracy Analysis of Intensity Perception. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2003, 29: 523-536. PMID: 12848324, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.523.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChoice response timeSpeeded classification paradigmSpeed-accuracy analysisSimple response timeResponse timeAuditory intensityAuditory signalsLoudness perceptionIntensity perceptionDecisional criteriaDifferent sound frequenciesLoudness recalibrationUnderlying representationAuditory systemWeak toneClassification paradigmPerceptionLoudnessRecalibrationMeasure of errorResponse criteriaToneSound intensityError rateStrong tones
2002
Psychophysical Scaling
Marks L, Gescheider G. Psychophysical Scaling. 2002 DOI: 10.1002/0471214426.pas0403.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPsychophysical scalingPerceptual processesPsychological eventsOvert responsePerceptual scalesPsychophysical responsesBinaural summationMethodological variablesTheoretical assumptionsTheoretical issuesMagnitude methodTheoretical frameworkPragmatic valueEmpirical operationChapter treatsPerceptionLoudnessScaleDiscriminationResponse transformationRepresentation
1995
Binaural summation after learning psychophysical functions for loudness
Marks L, Galanter E, Baird J. Binaural summation after learning psychophysical functions for loudness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1995, 57: 1209-1216. PMID: 8539096, DOI: 10.3758/bf03208377.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPerceptual processesResponse-related processesStimulus rangeBinaural summationPerceptual eventsPsychophysical functionsLoudness scaleMonaural signalAlgomBinaural signalsTrainingDozen subjectsLoudness exponentLoudnessLoudness summationLoudness matchesNominal functionPresent studySubjectsNumeric responsesBasic rules
1993
Contextual Processing of Multidimensional and Unidimensional Auditory Stimuli
Marks L. Contextual Processing of Multidimensional and Unidimensional Auditory Stimuli. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1993, 19: 227-249. PMID: 8473837, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.227.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPerceptual adaptationContextual processingStimulus contextAuditory stimuliContext effectsAssimilative effectLoudness perceptionContextual processesExperiment 15Adaptational processesLater processStimuliPerceptionMagnitude estimationJudgmentsEarly processLoudness comparisonsLoudnessProcessingMultidimensionalDifferent kindsContrastingContextProcessAdaptation
1992
The Contingency of Perceptual Processing: Context Modifies Equal-Loudness Relations
Marks L. The Contingency of Perceptual Processing: Context Modifies Equal-Loudness Relations. Psychological Science 1992, 3: 285-292. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00674.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchStimulus contextNumerical judgmentsSame experimental sessionPerceptual processingLoudness relationsAuditory processesOvert responseRecent stimulus historyMatching paradigmStimulus historyIndividual tonesExperimental sessionsRelative loudnessStimulus ensembleThird experimentContingent effectsJudgmentsHz toneLoudnessParadigmToneAnalogous effectLoudness matchesContextContingenciesSelective attention to loudness, ignoring pitch.
Melara R, Marks L, Yamagishi N. Selective attention to loudness, ignoring pitch. The Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America 1992, 91: 2380-2380. DOI: 10.1121/1.403335.Peer-Reviewed Original Research3 “What thin Partitions Sense from Thought Divide”: Toward a New Cognitive Psychophysics11Preparation of this chapter was supported in part by grant DC-00818 from the National Institutes of Health. I thank Daniel Algom and Bonnie Potts for comments on an earlier version. Please direct correspondence to Lawrence E. Marks, John B. Pierce Laboratory, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519.
Marks L. 3 “What thin Partitions Sense from Thought Divide”: Toward a New Cognitive Psychophysics11Preparation of this chapter was supported in part by grant DC-00818 from the National Institutes of Health. I thank Daniel Algom and Bonnie Potts for comments on an earlier version. Please direct correspondence to Lawrence E. Marks, John B. Pierce Laboratory, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519. Advances In Psychology 1992, 92: 115-186. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61779-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive psychologyPerceptual representationsInternal manipulationStimulus objectsSensory psychophysicsPsychophysical judgmentsAbstract symbolsMeasure of excitationSensory meaningsAuditory systemPsychophysicsSemantic theoryExternal stimuliAlgomMinitheoriesPsychologyMeasuresStimuliPerceptionReferentsJudgmentsLoudnessMeaningRepresentationSymbols
1990
Range and Regression, Loudness Scales, and Loudness Processing: Toward a Context-Bound Psychophysics
Algom D, Marks L. Range and Regression, Loudness Scales, and Loudness Processing: Toward a Context-Bound Psychophysics. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1990, 16: 706-727. PMID: 2148587, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.706.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHard andsoft interacting dimensions: Differential effects of dual context on classification
Melara R, Marks L. Hard andsoft interacting dimensions: Differential effects of dual context on classification. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1990, 47: 307-325. PMID: 2345683, DOI: 10.3758/bf03210870.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUnattended dimensionPerceptions of attributesForms of contextAttended dimensionStimulus attributesAuditory dimensionsDimensional interactionContextual constraintsRedundant contextsHard dimensionsTimbreClassification of attributesDifferential effectsSuch dimensionsLoudnessContextMulticlass tasksSoft dimensionsPerceptionTaskDimensionsAttributesPitchSubjectsGarner
1987
On Cross-Modal Similarity: Auditory-Visual Interactions in Speeded Discrimination
Marks L. On Cross-Modal Similarity: Auditory-Visual Interactions in Speeded Discrimination. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1987, 13: 384-394. PMID: 2958587, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.384.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-pitched tonesCross-modal interactionsCross-modal similarityAuditory-visual interactionsCross-modal perceptionAccuracy of responsesPerceptual levelSpeeded discriminationSynesthetic metaphorsSensory stimuliBright lightStimuliResponse speedToneLoud soundsDiscriminationSynesthesiaInformationallyPerceptionPitchLoudnessHearingProcessingSoundLight colorPerceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor.
Marks L, Hammeal R, Bornstein M, Smith L. Perceiving similarity and comprehending metaphor. Monographs Of The Society For Research In Child Development 1987, 52: 1-102. PMID: 3431563, DOI: 10.2307/1166084.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCross-modal similarityPerceptual knowledgeCross-modal perceptionYoung childrenVerbal tasksPerceiving similaritiesPerceptual similarityMeanings of componentsSynesthetic metaphorsVerbal processesVerbal modeDevelopmental timetablesAge 11Literal dimensionLiteral meaningCompound expressionsChildrenPerceptionMeaningAdultsMultidimensional spaceComprehensionMetaphorTaskLoudness
1986
On the Cross-Modal Perception of Intensity
Marks L, Szczesiul R, Ohlott P. On the Cross-Modal Perception of Intensity. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1986, 12: 517-534. PMID: 2946807, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.517.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAuditory loudnessSone scaleCross-modal equivalenceCross-modal perceptionCross-modal differencesVisual durationAuditory durationPerceptual experienceCase of loudnessAbsolute equivalenceDifferent sensesSequential dependenciesStimulus magnitudeAbsolute matchingCross-modality matchesLoudnessIndividual variationMagnitude matchingRelative matchingSessionsVisual brightnessStimuliPerceptionJudgmentsSenses
1984
Individual differences in loudness processing and loudness scales
Algom D, Marks L. Individual differences in loudness processing and loudness scales. Journal Of Experimental Psychology General 1984, 113: 571-593. PMID: 6240523, DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.571.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSone scaleBinaural summationMagnitude estimation functionsLoudness scaleAuditory intensity processingTemporal loudness summationIndividual differencesSensory representationsBinaural loudness summationInterval judgmentsLoudness intervalsPsychophysical functionsNormal hearingLoudness summationInterindividual differencesIntensity processingJudgmentsTemporal summationLoudnessIndividual variationIndividual subjects
1982
Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight
Marks L. Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1982, 8: 177-193. PMID: 6461716, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.177.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSynesthetic metaphorsSense modalitiesSynesthetic perceptionSensory experienceMetaphorical connectionsSynesthesiaGreater loudnessDifferent modalitiesPhenomenological similaritiesHigh pitchLoudnessPerceptionMetaphorVisual brightnessMeaningExperiencePitchWordsModalitiesLanguageDifferent kindsPhrasesPeople
1980
Psychophysical judgment: Wundt's theory revisited
Marks L. Psychophysical judgment: Wundt's theory revisited. Psychological Research 1980, 42: 157-164. DOI: 10.1007/bf00308699.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchWundt's theoryPsychological interpretationSone scaleSensory-perceptual processesRecent psychophysical researchPsychological relationshipPsychophysical researchSensory comparisonSensory excitationFechner's lawHierarchical organizationLoudness scalingMain postulatesApperceptionStimuliTheoryJudgmentsLoudnessOrganizationScaleSeeming incompatibilitySensationResearchRelationship
1979
Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness
Marks L. Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1979, 5: 426-443. PMID: 528950, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.5.3.426.Peer-Reviewed Original Research