2022
Open Debridement Alone Versus Open Debridement With Tendon Repair for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Comparison of Complications and 5-Year Reoperation Rates From a Large Insurance Database
Moran J, Gillinov SM, Schneble CA, Jimenez AE, Vaswani R, Mathew JI, Manzi JE, Nicholson AD, Blaine TA, Altchek DW, Gulotta LV, Dines JS. Open Debridement Alone Versus Open Debridement With Tendon Repair for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Comparison of Complications and 5-Year Reoperation Rates From a Large Insurance Database. Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicine 2022, 10: 23259671221120812. PMID: 36081412, PMCID: PMC9445466, DOI: 10.1177/23259671221120812.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchReoperation rateOpen debridementLateral epicondylitisTendon repairExtensor carpi radialis brevis tendonCarpi radialis brevis tendonStudy periodLarge insurance databaseLateral epicondylitis patientsComparison of complicationsAdverse event ratesRecalcitrant lateral epicondylitisReimbursement amountsAbsolute risk reductionLow complication rateLevel of evidenceOD cohortBrevis tendonPostoperative complicationsCohort studyComplication rateOD patientsInsurance databaseSignificant changesRisk factorsNo Difference in Complication or Reoperation Rates Between Arthroscopic and Open Debridement for Lateral Epicondylitis: A National Database Study
Moran J, Gillinov SM, Jimenez AE, Schneble CA, Manzi JE, Vaswani R, Mathew JI, Nicholson AD, Kunze KN, Gulotta LV, Altchek DW, Dines JS. No Difference in Complication or Reoperation Rates Between Arthroscopic and Open Debridement for Lateral Epicondylitis: A National Database Study. Arthroscopy The Journal Of Arthroscopic And Related Surgery 2022, 39: 245-252. PMID: 36049587, DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsArthroscopic debridementReoperation rateOpen debridementLateral epicondylitisPlatelet-rich plasma injectionExtensor carpi radialis brevisNational database studyRadial nerve injuryNonoperative treatment modalitiesSurgical site infectionCarpi radialis brevisCommon extensor tendonICD-10 codesCross-sectional studyLogistic regression analysisSignificant differencesOD cohortCorticosteroid injectionNonoperative treatmentPostoperative complicationsSepsis eventsAdverse eventsComplication rateNerve injurySite infection
2021
Surgical Excision of a Giant Schwannoma of the Hand
Moran J, Kahan JB, Schneble CA, Lindskog D, Donohue K. Surgical Excision of a Giant Schwannoma of the Hand. JBJS Case Connector 2021, 11: e21.00318. PMID: 34534146, DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.21.00318.Peer-Reviewed Case Reports and Technical NotesEarly success of the arthroscopic-assisted locked loop suprapectoral biceps tenodesis
Kahan J, Schneble C, Applonie R, Nicholson A, Whittall I, Talley-Bruns R, Jorgensen A, LaVette N, Moran J, Ware J, Lee F, Blaine T. Early success of the arthroscopic-assisted locked loop suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. JSES Reviews Reports And Techniques 2021, 1: 96-101. PMID: 37588143, PMCID: PMC10426584, DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.02.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBiceps tenodesisPostoperative complicationsPopeye deformityAnterior shoulderConcomitant operative proceduresSeries of patientsYears of ageSuprapectoral biceps tenodesisPrior biomechanical studiesTenodesis proceduresSingle surgeonSurgical indicationsMuscle crampingRevision surgeryTenodesis techniquesSurgical techniqueInclusion criteriaLower incidenceOperative procedureTenodesisPatientsPainSimple sutureBiomechanical studyComplications
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply