Skip to Main Content

Vaccination Policy and Politics During the Covid-19 Pandemic

January 22, 2021
  • 00:00And everyone I'm going to talk
  • 00:02a bit about policy and politics
  • 00:04around vaccines during COVID-19.
  • 00:05And like so many of us during this pandemic,
  • 00:08our work and what we're doing has
  • 00:10expanded to meet the moment for me.
  • 00:13That has meant expanding from my work,
  • 00:15which is typically looked at analyzing,
  • 00:17studying the policy process,
  • 00:18studying the use of evidence and
  • 00:20policy making in public health,
  • 00:21particularly around vaccines and
  • 00:23thinking about ways in which those
  • 00:25processes can be strengthened.
  • 00:26I'm still doing that,
  • 00:27but also have been contributing
  • 00:29in some ways to the.
  • 00:31The policy making process contributing
  • 00:32to the generation of evidence that can
  • 00:34inform how we think about these vaccines,
  • 00:36both in terms of regulation and rollout.
  • 00:38So in our time today,
  • 00:40I'll briefly walk through a
  • 00:41variety of those ways.
  • 00:43Colleagues and I have been contributing,
  • 00:44studying the work and also
  • 00:46contributing to this work around
  • 00:47COVID-19 vaccine policy and politics.
  • 00:49I think just by way of context,
  • 00:51we know some of the many challenges
  • 00:53before us in terms of a public
  • 00:55health and health policy community
  • 00:57with respect to vaccines,
  • 00:58it's a balancing act as I try
  • 01:00to articulate here between.
  • 01:01Recognizing the urgency of the crisis,
  • 01:03the need to rapidly innovate,
  • 01:05including innovate,
  • 01:06not just scientifically,
  • 01:07but with our regulatory and policy
  • 01:09making activities while also still
  • 01:10figuring out how we can make most use
  • 01:13of our mechanisms or processes that
  • 01:15are in place for evaluating evidence
  • 01:17and putting that evidence into work.
  • 01:18And at the same time generating and
  • 01:21gathering and rapidly incorporating
  • 01:22the evidence that can help us do
  • 01:24that more efficiently and more
  • 01:26effectively with respect to COVID-19
  • 01:27vaccines in the United States.
  • 01:29As you heard earlier today,
  • 01:31and are no doubt well aware.
  • 01:33Operation Warp Speed is perhaps the
  • 01:35most visible representation of those
  • 01:37efforts to innovate in to accelerate
  • 01:38the research and development process,
  • 01:40and you've heard about it.
  • 01:42There's months of slowie the scientific
  • 01:44head of the operation warp speed effort,
  • 01:47and then you've heard about that their work.
  • 01:50I don't need to repeat the way
  • 01:52in which they were intended to
  • 01:54facilitate and accelerate some of the
  • 01:56research and development programs,
  • 01:58as well as the manufacturing of vaccines
  • 02:01where that balancing act in in terms of of.
  • 02:04How we think about that first
  • 02:06sort of tension?
  • 02:06I articulated where the questions around
  • 02:08the review and evaluation of vaccine
  • 02:10candidates and persisting concerns
  • 02:12throughout the summer into the fall,
  • 02:14and actually just recently affirmed
  • 02:15just in the past few hours by
  • 02:18by Doctor Stephen Hahn.
  • 02:19The current FDA commissioner
  • 02:20regarding concerns about pressure
  • 02:22to two on the part of the White
  • 02:24House on the part of the outgoing
  • 02:26president to accelerate to interfere.
  • 02:28Perhaps with the review of vaccine
  • 02:30candidates by the Food and Drug
  • 02:32Administration over over this past fall.
  • 02:34And we heard repeatedly into
  • 02:35great credit of Doctor Marx,
  • 02:37who will hear from in a little bit,
  • 02:39and his colleagues at the FDA
  • 02:41loud and clear in
  • 02:42this paper in JAMA is a
  • 02:44representative example of it.
  • 02:45From September, the degree to which
  • 02:47they were committed to preserving,
  • 02:49to strengthening to defending the
  • 02:50scientific review process of these
  • 02:52vaccine candidates to allow there not to
  • 02:54be compromises with respect to the to
  • 02:56the speed and quality of the evidence.
  • 02:58Review, even as we were moving quickly,
  • 03:00still still in a rigorous way,
  • 03:02but quickly through the vaccine
  • 03:04development process that balancing act.
  • 03:05And that that work to preserve the
  • 03:07integrity of the FDA review process,
  • 03:09I think, was a was a great asset
  • 03:12and remains a great asset,
  • 03:13taking one one of the challenges off
  • 03:15the table that we now encounter with
  • 03:17respect to these vaccines in September,
  • 03:19the New England Journal.
  • 03:21Drawing upon my prior work studying the
  • 03:23Vaccine Expert Advisory Committee process,
  • 03:24the role of expert advisors and public
  • 03:26health policy making more generally
  • 03:28in the important role they can play
  • 03:30in transparency and in promoting
  • 03:32public confidence in vaccines.
  • 03:33I wrote a piece that supported this measure,
  • 03:36relying on our government scientists.
  • 03:37Those expert advisors such as.
  • 03:39Burp active vaccines Advisory committee
  • 03:40that met so prominently with our
  • 03:43initial vaccine candidates in December.
  • 03:44The value that those mechanisms those
  • 03:46processes those time tested review
  • 03:48entities serve even in this time
  • 03:50of great urgency and innovation.
  • 03:52And I think the review process that we
  • 03:54found ourselves with left us with not
  • 03:57just highly efficacious ANAN vaccines
  • 03:59with a very favorable safety profile,
  • 04:01but real confidence in the quality of the
  • 04:03work by which that evidence was collected
  • 04:06and by which that evidence was analyzing.
  • 04:09At the state level,
  • 04:10we're seeing lots of of attention
  • 04:12to the role that states are playing
  • 04:14in the vaccine rollout,
  • 04:15including not just the issues
  • 04:17around allocation that are getting
  • 04:18a lot of attention recently.
  • 04:19Of course, for understandable reasons,
  • 04:21but also the question about how
  • 04:23the science can inform the way in
  • 04:25which the state of Connecticut and
  • 04:26other states are supporting the
  • 04:28rollout and distribution of these
  • 04:30vaccines here in Connecticut.
  • 04:31As, as you heard,
  • 04:32were one of those states that has a
  • 04:34vaccine advisory committee on which
  • 04:36I serve along with aryel colleagues
  • 04:37Brick Martinello and Albert Cohen.
  • 04:39Jim hadler.
  • 04:40On our main advisory group and the
  • 04:42Science subcommittee and one of
  • 04:43the responsibilities of our group
  • 04:45is not to replace or usurp,
  • 04:47or to duplicate the work that the FDA did.
  • 04:50Reviewing the vaccine candidates.
  • 04:51But,
  • 04:51as these vaccines were being made available,
  • 04:53and as they had been authorized
  • 04:55by the FDA to affirm the integrity
  • 04:57of those review processes to look
  • 04:59carefully at the data,
  • 05:00the way in which the data was collected,
  • 05:03the way in which it was reviewed,
  • 05:05and to provide one more set of eyes,
  • 05:07one more vote of confidence that
  • 05:09we could have.
  • 05:10We could we could trust the mechanisms
  • 05:13that were used to help us get the
  • 05:15vaccines that we're now rolling out,
  • 05:17and you can see the summary
  • 05:18statement here affirming the
  • 05:19integrity of the processor recommendation
  • 05:21that our science subcommittee,
  • 05:23major Governor Lamont first for
  • 05:24the Pfizer by Ontech vaccine,
  • 05:26and again for the Moderna vaccine
  • 05:28in a process, will continue for
  • 05:29subsequent vaccine candidates.
  • 05:30As part of this broader effort to
  • 05:33build confidence in the vaccines and
  • 05:35to help support and evidenced way
  • 05:37their rollout and their distribution.
  • 05:39As we turn to the issues around rollout and.
  • 05:44Next slide here is not advancing,
  • 05:46which is a bit problematic.
  • 05:47Excuse me here as we turn to the
  • 05:50issues around roll out and hopefully
  • 05:52you can still see that slide.
  • 05:54Here colleagues and I picking up on
  • 05:56some of the work that Jenny Pitts
  • 05:58and her colleagues in the public
  • 06:00Health Modeling Unit are doing.
  • 06:02Another of their colleagues in mind,
  • 06:04David Pal teal from the School
  • 06:06of Public Health,
  • 06:07along with Doctor Rochelle Lenski,
  • 06:09the incoming director of the CDC,
  • 06:11and the new administration.
  • 06:12We looked using mathematical
  • 06:13modeling techniques at how
  • 06:15different vaccine candidates.
  • 06:16Having different profiles,
  • 06:17hypothetical profiles with respect
  • 06:18to their efficacy as defined in
  • 06:20different ways against infection
  • 06:21or transmission or severity.
  • 06:22Looking at different ways in which
  • 06:24vaccines are implemented in terms
  • 06:26of the pace of their roll out,
  • 06:28the number of individuals in terms of
  • 06:30the fraction of the population reached,
  • 06:32as well as what the state of the
  • 06:34pandemic is at the circumstances
  • 06:36which in which a vaccine is
  • 06:38introduced as measured through
  • 06:39through our party and what we did in
  • 06:42collapsing a lot of work and into
  • 06:44a single slide that that could be.
  • 06:46Full paper was to look at,
  • 06:48see what factors could help drive
  • 06:51a vaccine rollout that could be
  • 06:53most effective at reducing cases
  • 06:55of COVID-19 and reducing deaths
  • 06:57and what we found summarizing
  • 06:58a lot of information into a key
  • 07:01point was looking at the effects
  • 07:03that implementation really has.
  • 07:04As the title suggests,
  • 07:06here that even if we have very
  • 07:08highly efficacious vaccines,
  • 07:10this slide only went up to 75% efficacy,
  • 07:12but the pattern holds that even 95%
  • 07:15efficacy that what will be matter critically.
  • 07:18Or it is the pace in which we
  • 07:20can implement these vaccines,
  • 07:21the speed at which we can roll them out,
  • 07:24the number of the percentage of the
  • 07:26population we can reach and how
  • 07:28effectively we are holding down
  • 07:30the pandemic at the time in which
  • 07:32the vaccines are being introduced
  • 07:33as measured through RT that we can
  • 07:35accrue much greater vaccine related
  • 07:36benefits around those circumstances
  • 07:38of implementation almost as much
  • 07:40so as some incremental advantages
  • 07:41in vaccine efficacy itself,
  • 07:42we summarize some of these key findings
  • 07:45in a companion Op Ed and USA TODAY.
  • 07:47Back in November,
  • 07:48when we wrote this paper.
  • 07:49Really emphasizing things that we're all
  • 07:52living through and seeing right now,
  • 07:54and the public health community has
  • 07:56been thinking about for sometime
  • 07:58about the importance of distribution,
  • 08:00the importance of continuing our
  • 08:02public health strategies to keep the
  • 08:04virus manageable, all things considered,
  • 08:06an the importance in investment.
  • 08:08The investment in implementation of
  • 08:09vaccine distribution and delivery.
  • 08:11As we wrote in in November,
  • 08:13challenges that we're continuing to see now,
  • 08:16and hopefully efforts that will
  • 08:18improve as the weeks and months ago.
  • 08:20Along with respect to the to the
  • 08:23investments in vaccine rollout
  • 08:24that we're now encountering.
  • 08:26My colleagues and I have continued this
  • 08:28work looking using that model as well
  • 08:30to think about questions that have
  • 08:32also come up earlier today thinking
  • 08:34about particular one dose vaccines,
  • 08:36windows vaccines or Windows vaccine regimens.
  • 08:37If there are studied and confirmed,
  • 08:39what would we look at in terms
  • 08:41of the of the trade offs in over
  • 08:43a six month time horizon?
  • 08:45Is this paper looks at in terms of the
  • 08:48advantages of a one dose formulation
  • 08:49in terms of of providing efficacy
  • 08:51more quickly than two doses in terms
  • 08:53of what level of efficacy might?
  • 08:56Below that 95% threshold we now have
  • 08:59result in as many infections or deaths
  • 09:01averted and what we found using our model,
  • 09:04which again no model is perfect.
  • 09:07But they help frame and
  • 09:08hopefully inform the debate.
  • 09:10We found that a single dose vaccine that
  • 09:13provides protection over an indefinite
  • 09:15period could have an efficacy of 55%
  • 09:17and invert as many infections over a
  • 09:20six month period as that 95% two dose
  • 09:23vaccine series and if efficacy wanes,
  • 09:25obviously that's an important consideration.
  • 09:27Well then, even uh.
  • 09:28Duration, mean,
  • 09:29duration of efficacy of 75%,
  • 09:31mean duration of efficacy of six months,
  • 09:33rather even a 75% efficacy could
  • 09:35avert the same number of infections
  • 09:37as a two dose series.
  • 09:38Just looking at the advantages
  • 09:40of getting immunity more quickly.
  • 09:41Not to mention the issues around pacing
  • 09:43and speed of vaccine distribution.
  • 09:45So one data point again a full
  • 09:47paper that's hard to do justice
  • 09:49to in a single slide.
  • 09:51That helps us to try and think
  • 09:53about some of these considerations
  • 09:54that might emerge in the weeks and
  • 09:57months ahead as we begin thinking
  • 09:59about collecting more data.
  • 10:00Out windows alternatives.
  • 10:01Very briefly and then to try to help
  • 10:05us return a closer to schedule,
  • 10:07I want to turn to the global context here.
  • 10:10Such an important consideration.
  • 10:12Lots of our colleagues here at Yale
  • 10:14and elsewhere have been thinking much
  • 10:16more deeply around the global vaccine story,
  • 10:18including my colleagues at over,
  • 10:20who's up next year.
  • 10:21But it's such an important part of
  • 10:23this broader policy and politics
  • 10:25conversation around around covid vaccines.
  • 10:27BMJ published two very nice papers
  • 10:29earlier this year last month.
  • 10:31Actually in December. Looking at.
  • 10:33The marketplace of vaccine reservations
  • 10:35that exist for cobin 19 vaccines.
  • 10:37The countries that are procured
  • 10:39vaccines how many have been procured.
  • 10:42The the vaccine supply anticipated
  • 10:44for a vaccination.
  • 10:45Programs in low and middle income countries,
  • 10:48particularly through international
  • 10:49collaborations.
  • 10:50In one paper and the other looked
  • 10:52at the demand, you know,
  • 10:54tried to measure what the actual need,
  • 10:56the demand for these vaccines will be
  • 10:58a globally depending on how we think
  • 10:59about high priority groups or how
  • 11:01we cast broader Nets.
  • 11:02And they asked me to write a
  • 11:04companion tutorial that I'll close
  • 11:05with here just to return us to the
  • 11:07issue of of politics and policy in
  • 11:09those intersections that I study.
  • 11:10In most of my work,
  • 11:12and as as we know here at this,
  • 11:14at this moment of transition,
  • 11:15and at this important inflection
  • 11:17point in our vaccination effort
  • 11:18here in the United States and
  • 11:19around the world, you know.
  • 11:21We know that how important
  • 11:22this spirit of solidarity,
  • 11:24global collaboration,
  • 11:25but particularly leadership,
  • 11:26from from high income wealthy
  • 11:27countries will be to the success
  • 11:29of global vaccination efforts,
  • 11:31both in the financial, logistical,
  • 11:32technical way as important partners.
  • 11:34If we're going to have an equitable
  • 11:36global vaccine rollout,
  • 11:37and as I know here,
  • 11:39I think we're at a point where the
  • 11:41re engagement of the United States
  • 11:43in that global health community
  • 11:45beginning tomorrow with the return
  • 11:47to the World Health Organization,
  • 11:49and hopefully what that signals for
  • 11:51COVID-19 vaccine efforts globally as well.
  • 11:53It is a very favorable signal that will
  • 11:55certainly not solve their problems ahead,
  • 11:57but will be really valuable in getting us
  • 11:59in the right direction on the global front.
  • 12:01So with that I will conclude I'm happy
  • 12:03to follow up individually by email.
  • 12:05There's my Twitter handle as well,
  • 12:07and thanks again for the opportunity to
  • 12:09be part of this group this afternoon.
  • 12:12Thank you.