2025
Type 2 immunity to the rescue: enhancing antitumor immunity for skin cancer prevention
Vesely M, Christensen S. Type 2 immunity to the rescue: enhancing antitumor immunity for skin cancer prevention. Journal Of Clinical Investigation 2025, 135: e188018. PMID: 39744952, PMCID: PMC11684797, DOI: 10.1172/jci188018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCutaneous squamous cell carcinomaThymic stromal lymphopoietinType 2 immunityActinic keratosisAK lesionsTh2 cellsPrevent cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaRecruitment of Th2 cellsCSCC preventionSquamous cell carcinomaMouse model of skin carcinogenesisModel of skin carcinogenesisDamage-associated molecular patternsKeratinocyte cell deathAntitumor immunityTopical calcipotriolSkin cancer preventionCell carcinomaPaired biopsiesPrecursor lesionsSkin carcinogenesisUnaffected skinMouse modelCancer preventionPremalignant keratinocytes
2022
Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases
Chia D, Sundar R, Kim G, Ang J, Shabbir A, So J, Yong W. Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2022, 30: 1889-1890. PMID: 36564654, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12877-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOutcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases
Chia D, Sundar R, Kim G, Ang J, Lum J, Nga M, Goh G, Seet J, Chee C, Tan H, Ho J, Ngoi N, Lee M, Muthu V, Chan G, Pang A, Ang Y, Choo J, Lim J, Teh J, Lwin A, Soon Y, Shabbir A, So J, Yong W. Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel plus Systemic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2022, 29: 8597-8605. PMID: 36070113, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11998-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGastric cancer peritoneal metastasisIP-PTXConversion surgeryIntraperitoneal paclitaxelMedian OSSystemic chemotherapyPeritoneal metastasisSC groupConversion to negative cytologyResultsThe median OSProgression-free survivalPhase II studyMethodsForty-four patientsIntravenous oxaliplatinMedian PFSOral capecitabineSystemic capecitabineExtraperitoneal metastasesNegative cytologyPeritoneal diseaseOverall survivalPerformance statusPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsIP cohortA Systematic Review of Conversion to Resectability in Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Trials
Chrabaszcz S, Rajeev R, Witmer H, Dhiman A, Klooster B, Gamblin T, Banerjee A, Johnston F, Turaga K. A Systematic Review of Conversion to Resectability in Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Trials. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2022, 45: 366-372. PMID: 35838247, DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000921.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMetastatic colorectal cancerUnresectable metastatic colorectal cancerOverall survivalClinical trialsPrimary outcome of OSStudy armsImproved OS of patientsConversion to resectabilitySuperior overall survivalOS of patientsSignificant survival benefitOutcomes of OSMedian survival differenceRandomized clinical trialsHigh response rateDose-effect responseMedian OSImproved OSChemotherapy trialsSurvival benefitExposure of interestPatient cohortSurvival differencesChemotherapeutic agentsColorectal cancer
2021
Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response–Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial
Goodman KA, Ou FS, Hall NC, Bekaii-Saab T, Fruth B, Twohy E, Meyers MO, Boffa DJ, Mitchell K, Frankel WL, Niedzwiecki D, Noonan A, Janjigian YY, Thurmes PJ, Venook AP, Meyerhardt JA, O'Reilly EM, Ilson DH. Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response–Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 2803-2815. PMID: 34077237, PMCID: PMC8407649, DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03611.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18FluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsSurvival RateYoung AdultConceptsPositron emission tomographyRepeat positron emission tomographyPET respondersEsophagogastric junction adenocarcinomaStandardized uptake valueInduction FOLFOXPET nonrespondersPCR rateOverall survivalJunction adenocarcinomaPathologic complete response rateRandomized phase II studyBaseline positron emission tomographyMaximum standardized uptake valueInduction chemotherapy regimenComplete response rateEarly response assessmentMedian overall survivalPhase II studyPrimary end pointCombined modality therapySame chemotherapyChemotherapy regimenEligible patientsII study5‐Fluorouracil efficacy requires anti‐tumor immunity triggered by cancer‐cell‐intrinsic STING
Tian J, Zhang D, Kurbatov V, Wang Q, Wang Y, Fang D, Wu L, Bosenberg M, Muzumdar MD, Khan S, Lu Q, Yan Q, Lu J. 5‐Fluorouracil efficacy requires anti‐tumor immunity triggered by cancer‐cell‐intrinsic STING. The EMBO Journal 2021, 40: embj2020106065. PMID: 33615517, PMCID: PMC8013832, DOI: 10.15252/embj.2020106065.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnti-tumor immunityTumor burdenSubsequent type I interferon productionHigh STING expressionIntratumoral T cellsT-cell depletionType I interferon productionI interferon productionLoss of STINGImmunocompetent hostsColorectal specimensT cellsSTING expressionBetter survivalHigh doseTherapeutic effectivenessHuman colorectal specimensMelanoma tumorsInterferon productionChemotherapeutic drugsMurine colonImmunityEfficacyStingsColonEvaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer
Patel KK, Stein S, Lacy J, O’Hara M, Huntington SF. Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Doublet Therapy in Metastatic BRAF Variant Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2021, 4: e2033441. PMID: 33433598, PMCID: PMC7804917, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33441.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuality-adjusted life yearsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioDoublet therapyStandard chemotherapyColorectal cancerCost-effectiveness modelProbabilistic sensitivity analysesParametric survival modelingBEACON trialEconomic evaluationMAIN OUTCOMECurrent pricingLife yearsIncremental costLifetime costsBest supportive careLines of therapyProlonged overall survivalLarge clinical trialsClinical trial designHigh microsatellite instabilityCumulative costsOverall survivalSupportive care
2020
A phase 1b expansion study of TAS‐102 with oxaliplatin for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
Cecchini M, Kortmansky JS, Cui C, Wei W, Thumar JR, Uboha NV, Hafez N, Lacy J, Fischbach NA, Sabbath KD, Gomez CM, Sporn JR, Stein S, Hochster HS. A phase 1b expansion study of TAS‐102 with oxaliplatin for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 2020, 127: 1417-1424. PMID: 33351187, PMCID: PMC8085021, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33379.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinProgression-Free SurvivalPyrrolidinesResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsThymineTrifluridineConceptsMetastatic colorectal cancerOverall response rateRefractory metastatic colorectal cancerProgression-free survivalTAS-102Colorectal cancerDay 1Primary endpointOverall survivalDose escalationDay 5Median progression-free survivalPhase 1b studyMedian overall survivalResponse Evaluation CriteriaTreat populationDose expansionPartial responseStandard dosesUnexpected side effectsStudy treatmentTumor shrinkageUnexpected toxicitiesSide effectsNovel antimetaboliteIntegration of Antiangiogenic Therapy with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Chong W, Lim C, Sinha A, Tan C, Chan G, Huang Y, Kumarakulasinghe N, Sundar R, Jeyasekharan A, Loh W, Tay J, Yadav K, Wang L, Wong A, Kong L, Soo R, Lau J, Soon Y, Goh R, Ho F, Chong S, Lee S, Loh K, Tai B, Lim Y, Goh B. Integration of Antiangiogenic Therapy with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research 2020, 26: 5320-5328. PMID: 32816944, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1727.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLocally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomaAdvanced nasopharyngeal carcinomaNasopharyngeal carcinomaConcurrent chemoradiationGemcitabine chemotherapyArm CIncreased immune cell infiltrationComplete metabolic responsePosttreatment tumor biopsiesAnti-VEGF therapyArm A patientsRelapse-free survivalMetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomaImmune cell infiltrationImmune cell traffickingVEGF axisTumor responseInduction cisplatinAntiangiogenic therapyTumor biopsiesTumor perfusionA patientsFDG-PETPericyte coverageStandard treatmentA Single-Institution Experience of Induction 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Surgery Versus Consolidative Radiation for Borderline and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.
Cecchini M, Miccio JA, Pahade J, Lacy J, Salem RR, Johnson SB, Blakaj A, Stein S, Kortmansky JS, Johung KL. A Single-Institution Experience of Induction 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Surgery Versus Consolidative Radiation for Borderline and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2020, 49: 904-911. PMID: 32658074, DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001592.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaLA PDACUnresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaInduction FOLFIRINOXConsolidative radiotherapyOverall survivalAdvanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaSingle-center retrospective reviewMeaningful survival benefitMedian overall survivalUnresectable pancreatic cancerR0 resection rateKaplan-Meier methodSingle institution experienceBenefits of surgeryLog-rank testConsolidative radiationDefinitive radiationLA patientsPreoperative radiationResection rateSurgery patientsSurvival benefitSurvival impactImproved survivalEvaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype–Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Catenacci D, Chase L, Lomnicki S, Karrison T, de Wilton Marsh R, Rampurwala M, Narula S, Alpert L, Setia N, Xiao S, Hart J, Siddiqui U, Peterson B, Moore K, Kipping-Johnson K, Markevicius U, Gordon B, Allen K, Racette C, Maron S, Liao C, Polite B, Kindler H, Turaga K, Prachand V, Roggin K, Ferguson M, Posner M. Evaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype–Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Network Open 2020, 3: e1921290. PMID: 32058557, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21290.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLocally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomaPathological response gradeAdvanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomaGastroesophageal adenocarcinomaResection rateMargin-negativeResponse gradeMargin-negative resection rateMedian disease-free survivalUGT1A1 genotype groupsMedian overall survivalLocally advanced adenocarcinomaHigher adverse eventsR0 resection rateDisease-free survivalCoprimary end pointsPhase 2 trialRate of recurrenceIntestinal-type tumorsR0 resectionR1 resectionAdvanced adenocarcinomaNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPerioperative therapyOverall survival
2019
Randomized, Phase II Study Prospectively Evaluating Treatment of Metastatic Esophageal, Gastric, or Gastroesophageal Cancer by Gene Expression of ERCC1: SWOG S1201.
Iqbal S, McDonough S, Lenz HJ, Ilson D, Burtness B, Nangia CS, Barzi A, Schneider CJ, Liu JJ, Dotan E, Guthrie KA, Hochster HS. Randomized, Phase II Study Prospectively Evaluating Treatment of Metastatic Esophageal, Gastric, or Gastroesophageal Cancer by Gene Expression of ERCC1: SWOG S1201. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 38: 472-479. PMID: 31815582, PMCID: PMC7007287, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00925.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFluorouracilGene ExpressionHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsYoung AdultConceptsProgression-free survivalAdvanced esophagogastric cancerPhase II studyPlatinum-based therapyOverall survivalII studySuperior median progression-free survivalMedian progression-free survivalMRNA expressionRegimen of irinotecanUpper GI tumorsZubrod performance statusPercent of patientsOccurrence of gradeStandard of careMetastatic esophagealEsophagogastric cancerPerformance statusUntreated patientsGastroesophageal cancerGI tumorsTreatment armsFOLFOXPlatinum sensitivityPatientsA New Strategy for Identifying Mechanisms of Drug-drug Interaction Using Transcriptome Analysis: Compound Kushen Injection as a Proof of Principle
Shen H, Qu Z, Harata-Lee Y, Cui J, Aung TN, Wang W, Kortschak RD, Adelson DL. A New Strategy for Identifying Mechanisms of Drug-drug Interaction Using Transcriptome Analysis: Compound Kushen Injection as a Proof of Principle. Scientific Reports 2019, 9: 15889. PMID: 31685921, PMCID: PMC6828681, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52375-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscriptome analysisCompound Kushen InjectionCo-expression analysisPotential targetPotential molecular mechanismsTranscriptome dataImportant genesMDA-MB-231 cellsProof of principlePhenotype resultsMolecular mechanismsCytotoxic effectsMetabolic processesMajor regulatorA431 cellsAntagonistic cytotoxic effectsKushen InjectionDNA synthesisCancer cellsInhibition of MyD88GenesComplex herbal mixturesMyD88 geneChemotherapy drugsCancer chemotherapy drugsPembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G, Psyrri A, Basté N, Neupane P, Bratland Å, Fuereder T, Hughes BGM, Mesía R, Ngamphaiboon N, Rordorf T, Ishak W, Hong RL, Mendoza R, Roy A, Zhang Y, Gumuscu B, Cheng JD, Jin F, Rischin D, Investigators K, Lerzo G, Tatangelo M, Varela M, Zarba J, Boyer M, Gan H, Gao B, Hughes B, Mallesara G, Rischin D, Taylor A, Burian M, Fuereder T, Greil R, Barrios C, de Castro D, Castro G, Franke F, Girotto G, Lima I, Nicolau U, Pinto G, Santos L, Victorino A, Chua N, Couture F, Gregg R, Hansen A, Hilton J, McCarthy J, Soulieres D, Ascui R, Gonzalez P, Villanueva L, Torregroza M, Zambrano A, Holeckova P, Kral Z, Melichar B, Prausova J, Vosmik M, Andersen M, Gyldenkerne N, Jurgens H, Putnik K, Reinikainen P, Gruenwald V, Laban S, Aravantinos G, Boukovinas I, Georgoulias V, Psyrri A, Kwong D, Al-Farhat Y, Csoszi T, Erfan J, Horvai G, Landherr L, Remenar E, Ruzsa A, Szota J, Billan S, Gluck I, Gutfeld O, Popovtzer A, Benasso M, Bui S, Ferrari V, Licitra L, Nole F, Fujii T, Fujimoto Y, Hanai N, Hara H, Matsumoto K, Mitsugi K, Monden N, Nakayama M, Okami K, Oridate N, Shiga K, Shimizu Y, Sugasawa M, Tahara M, Takahashi M, Takahashi S, Tanaka K, Ueda T, Yamaguchi H, Yamazaki T, Yasumatsu R, Yokota T, Yoshizaki T, Kudaba I, Stara Z, Ishak W, Cheah S, Ponce J, Mendoza R, Hernandez C, Soto F, Buter J, Hoeben A, Oosting S, Suijkerbuijk K, Bratland A, Brydoey M, Alvarez R, Mas L, Caguioa P, Querol J, Regala E, Tamayo M, Villegas E, Kawecki A, Karpenko A, Klochikhin A, Smolin A, Zarubenkov O, Goh B, Cohen G, du Toit J, Jordaan C, Landers G, Ruff P, Szpak W, Tabane N, Brana I, Docampo L, Lavernia J, Mesia R, Abel E, Muratidu V, Nielsen N, Cristina V, Rordorf T, Rothschild S, Hong R, Wang H, Yang M, Yeh S, Yen C, Ngamphaiboon N, Soparattanapaisarn N, Sriuranpong V, Aksoy S, Cicin I, Ekenel M, Harputluoglu H, Ozyilkan O, Harrington K, Agarwala S, Ali H, Alter R, Anderson D, Bruce J, Burtness B, Campbell N, Conde M, Deeken J, Edenfield W, Feldman L, Gaughan E, Goueli B, Halmos B, Hegde U, Hunis B, Jotte R, Karnad A, Khan S, Laudi N, Laux D, Martincic D, McCune S, McGaughey D, Misiukiewicz K, Mulford D, Nadler E, Neupane P, Nunnink J, Ohr J, O'Malley M, Patson B, Paul D, Popa E, Powell S, Redman R, Rella V, Lima C, Sivapiragasam A, Su Y, Sukari A, Wong S, Yilmaz E, Yorio J. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet 2019, 394: 1915-1928. PMID: 31679945, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32591-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCombined positive scoreSecond interim analysisProgression-free survivalPD-L1 combined positive scoreAppropriate first-line treatmentFirst-line treatmentOverall survivalSquamous cell carcinomaChemotherapy groupMetastatic HNSCCInterim analysisAdverse eventsAlone groupCell carcinomaFinal analysisCell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressionDeath ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressionMetastatic squamous cell carcinomaNeck squamous cell carcinomaCause adverse eventsPD-L1 positivityLigand 1 expressionPD-L1 expressionTotal populationIncurable recurrentDNA epigenetic signature predictive of benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the MRC OE02 trial
Sundar R, Ng A, Zouridis H, Padmanabhan N, Sheng T, Zhang S, Lee M, Ooi W, Qamra A, Inam I, Hewitt L, So J, Koh V, Nankivell M, Langley R, Allum W, Cunningham D, Rozen S, Yong W, Grabsch H, Tan P. DNA epigenetic signature predictive of benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the MRC OE02 trial. European Journal Of Cancer 2019, 123: 48-57. PMID: 31655359, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival RateConceptsCS armNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalOesophageal adenocarcinomaDNA methylation signaturesHistological subtypes of oesophageal cancerOesophageal cancerIndependent cohortPredictive of chemotherapy benefitSubtypes of oesophageal cancerIndependent cohort of patientsS armCox proportional hazards analysisResectable oesophageal cancerCohort of patientsPredictive of benefitMethylation signaturesDNA methylationPredictive of survivalProportional hazards analysisChemotherapy benefitHistological subtypesMetagene signatureRandomised patientsDNA methylation statusTreatment of Childhood Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Induction Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: Results of the Children's Oncology Group ARAR0331 Study.
Rodriguez-Galindo C, Krailo MD, Krasin MJ, Huang L, McCarville MB, Hicks J, Pashankar F, Pappo AS. Treatment of Childhood Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Induction Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: Results of the Children's Oncology Group ARAR0331 Study. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: 3369-3376. PMID: 31553639, PMCID: PMC6920031, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01276.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEvent-free survivalChildhood nasopharyngeal carcinomaInduction chemotherapyConcurrent chemoradiotherapyStage IIBNasopharyngeal carcinomaCycles of ICCancer stage IIBPediatric-specific studiesCycles of cisplatinOverall survival estimatesAmerican Joint CommitteeDoses of cisplatinCumulative incidence estimatesRadiation dose reductionAdult regimensStable diseaseAdvanced diseasePartial responseMedian ageExcellent outcomesIncidence estimatesDose reductionPatientsJoint CommitteeRandomized Trial of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Versus Capecitabine in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the CALGB 49907 Trial.
Muss HB, Polley MC, Berry DA, Liu H, Cirrincione CT, Theodoulou M, Mauer AM, Kornblith AB, Partridge AH, Dressler LG, Cohen HJ, Kartcheske PA, Perez EA, Wolff AC, Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Mahmood AA, Sutton LM, Magrinat G, Parker BA, Hart RD, Grenier D, Hurria A, Jatoi A, Norton L, Hudis CA, Winer EP, Carey L. Randomized Trial of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Versus Capecitabine in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the CALGB 49907 Trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: 2338-2348. PMID: 31339827, PMCID: PMC6900836, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00647.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrence-free survivalStandard adjuvant chemotherapyEarly breast cancerAdjuvant chemotherapyAge 65 yearsStandard chemotherapyBreast cancerOlder womenBreast cancer-specific survival ratesSurvival rateHormone receptor-negative diseaseHormone receptor-negative patientsHormone receptor-positive patientsCancer-specific survival ratesPatients age 65 yearsWomen age 65 yearsReceptor-negative patientsReceptor-positive patientsOverall survival benefitPrimary end pointReceptor-negative diseaseOverall survival rateAdaptive Bayesian designNonbreast cancersRFS ratesTargeting of TMPRSS4 sensitizes lung cancer cells to chemotherapy by impairing the proliferation machinery
Exposito F, Villalba M, Redrado M, de Aberasturi AL, Cirauqui C, Redin E, Guruceaga E, de Andrea C, Vicent S, Ajona D, Montuenga LM, Pio R, Calvo A. Targeting of TMPRSS4 sensitizes lung cancer cells to chemotherapy by impairing the proliferation machinery. Cancer Letters 2019, 453: 21-33. PMID: 30905815, DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.03.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTumor growthOverexpression of TMPRSS4Novel therapeutic targetSubcutaneous tumor growthHigh mortality rateLung cancer cellsG2/M phasePoor prognosisTumor engraftmentChemotherapy agentsTherapeutic targetMortality rateNSCLCNovel targetTMPRSS4Cancer cellsDownregulation of genesVivo assaysBiological effectsM phaseKD cellsMolecular mechanismsDownregulationCellsCell cycleWeekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, cetuximab, and cetuximab, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by local therapy in previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Haddad RI, Massarelli E, Lee JJ, Lin HY, Hutcheson K, Lewis J, Garden AS, Blumenschein GR, William WN, Pharaon RR, Tishler RB, Glisson BS, Pickering C, Gold KA, Johnson FM, Rabinowits G, Ginsberg LE, Williams MD, Myers J, Kies MS, Papadimitrakopoulou V. Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, cetuximab, and cetuximab, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by local therapy in previously untreated, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Annals Of Oncology 2019, 30: 471-477. PMID: 30596812, PMCID: PMC7360148, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy549.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCetuximabCisplatinDocetaxelFemaleFluorouracilHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsProgression-Free SurvivalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckConceptsProgression-free survivalSquamous cell carcinomaHigh-risk groupNeck squamous cell carcinomaPrimary end pointInduction chemotherapyLocal therapyCell carcinomaC-TPFAdvanced headT stageHistorical controlsEnd pointPhase II clinical trialHuman papillomavirus (HPV) statusLow-risk groupEligible patientsMedian followWeekly paclitaxelLocoregional treatmentT3-4P16 statusClinical trialsRisk groupsHPVPhase IB/II Randomized Study of FOLFIRINOX Plus Pegylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase Versus FOLFIRINOX Alone in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: SWOG S1313
Ramanathan RK, McDonough SL, Philip PA, Hingorani SR, Lacy J, Kortmansky JS, Thumar J, Chiorean EG, Shields AF, Behl D, Mehan PT, Gaur R, Seery T, Guthrie KA, Hochster HS. Phase IB/II Randomized Study of FOLFIRINOX Plus Pegylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase Versus FOLFIRINOX Alone in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: SWOG S1313. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: jco.18.01295. PMID: 30817250, PMCID: PMC6494359, DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01295.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMetastatic pancreatic cancerMedian overall survivalCombination armOverall survivalHazard ratioControl armPhase II open-label studyTreatment-related grade 3Adequate organ functionPhase II dosageOpen-label studyPrimary end pointMetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomaOS hazard ratioHA statusDose-finding studyInterim futility analysisRecombinant human hyaluronidaseEnoxaparin prophylaxisThromboembolic eventsPerformance statusProlong survivalRandomized studyFutility analysisGood PS
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply