Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Park D, An S, Attanasio S, Jolly N, Malhotra S, Doukky R, Samsky M, Sen S, Ahmad T, Nanna M, Vij A. Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2022, 187: 84-92. PMID: 36459752, PMCID: PMC10958453, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.10.026.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBayes TheoremDeathHeart FailureHumansHypotensionNeprilysinNetwork Meta-AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, AngiotensinStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftConceptsAngiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorAngiotensin receptor blockersReduced ejection fractionHeart failureEjection fractionHigh riskCause mortalityReceptor blockersCardiac deathLower riskEnzyme inhibitorsMajor adverse cardiac eventsAngiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitorsAdverse cardiac eventsEfficacy end pointNetwork meta-analysis approachImproved clinical outcomesRandomized clinical trialsP scoreCardiac eventsAngiotensin receptorsClinical outcomesNeprilysin inhibitorClinical benefitRecent trialsAbbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Park D, An S, Kumar A, Malhotra S, Jolly N, Kaur A, Kattoor A, Doukky R, Kalra A, Vij A. Abbreviated versus Standard Duration of DAPT after PCI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. American Journal Of Cardiovascular Drugs 2022, 22: 633-645. PMID: 35781867, DOI: 10.1007/s40256-022-00541-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNet adverse clinical eventsDuration of DAPTPercutaneous coronary interventionNetwork meta-analysisShorter duration of DAPTStent thrombosisMyocardial infarctionDrug-eluting stentsMeta-analysisResultsSeventeen randomized controlled trialsSystematic reviewAdverse cardiac eventsAdverse clinical eventsFrequentist network meta-analysesRisk of myocardial infarctionBackgroundDual antiplatelet therapyMonths of DAPTRandomized controlled trialsRandom-effects modelNetwork meta-analysesClinical presentationNo significant differenceAntiplatelet therapyMethodsThe present studyCardiac eventsSystematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Park D, An S, Jolly N, Attanasio S, Yadav N, Rao S, Vij A. Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2022, 11: e025394. PMID: 35723005, PMCID: PMC9238651, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.025394.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdverse cardiac eventsTarget lesion revascularizationTarget vessel revascularizationRandomized clinical trialsCardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionCardiac deathLesion revascularizationConventional meta-analysisVessel revascularizationStent thrombosisMyocardial infarctionMeta-analysisRelative riskProvisional stentingClinical trialsHigher rates of restenosisAssociated with lower procedural successCoronary interventionAssociated with lower riskPooled relative riskBayesian network meta-analysesFrequentist network meta-analysisAll-cause mortalityLower procedural success