2021
Palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (PALLAS): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study
Mayer EL, Dueck AC, Martin M, Rubovszky G, Burstein HJ, Bellet-Ezquerra M, Miller KD, Zdenkowski N, Winer EP, Pfeiler G, Goetz M, Ruiz-Borrego M, Anderson D, Nowecki Z, Loibl S, Moulder S, Ring A, Fitzal F, Traina T, Chan A, Rugo HS, Lemieux J, Henao F, Lyss A, Antolin Novoa S, Wolff AC, Vetter M, Egle D, Morris PG, Mamounas EP, Gil-Gil MJ, Prat A, Fohler H, Metzger Filho O, Schwarz M, DuFrane C, Fumagalli D, Theall KP, Lu DR, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Fesl C, DeMichele A, Gnant M. Palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (PALLAS): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. The Lancet Oncology 2021, 22: 212-222. PMID: 33460574, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30642-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInvasive disease-free survivalAdjuvant endocrine therapyDisease-free survivalInvasive disease-free survival eventsDisease-free survival eventsEndocrine therapySecond interim analysisBreast cancerInterim analysisAdverse eventsEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scoreSecond pre-planned interim analysisHER2-negative breast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerSurvival eventsIndependent data monitoring committeePre-planned interim analysisCommon grade 3Treatment-related deathsSerious adverse eventsProgression-free survivalEarly breast cancerMetastatic breast cancerInteractive response technologyGroup performance score
2020
Effect of Eribulin With or Without Pembrolizumab on Progression-Free Survival for Patients With Hormone Receptor–Positive, ERBB2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Tolaney SM, Barroso-Sousa R, Keenan T, Li T, Trippa L, Vaz-Luis I, Wulf G, Spring L, Sinclair NF, Andrews C, Pittenger J, Richardson ET, Dillon D, Lin NU, Overmoyer B, Partridge AH, Van Allen E, Mittendorf EA, Winer EP, Krop IE. Effect of Eribulin With or Without Pembrolizumab on Progression-Free Survival for Patients With Hormone Receptor–Positive, ERBB2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncology 2020, 6: 1598-1605. PMID: 32880602, PMCID: PMC7489368, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3524.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProgression-free survivalObjective response rateTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesTumor mutational burdenPD-L1 statusOverall survivalHormonal therapyPrior linesPD-L1Clinical trialsMedian numberDay 1Cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitorsERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancerMedian progression-free survivalDeath ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitorsEnd pointCause adverse eventsEfficacy of eribulinHormone receptor positiveMulticenter phase 2PD-L1 22C3Treatment-related deathsLines of chemotherapyPrimary end point
2019
Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Schmid P, Rugo HS, Adams S, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, Diéras V, Henschel V, Molinero L, Chui SY, Maiya V, Husain A, Winer EP, Loi S, Emens LA, Investigators I. Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2019, 21: 44-59. PMID: 31786121, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30689-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAlbuminsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisPaclitaxelPrognosisReceptor, ErbB-2Receptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSurvival RateTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsYoung AdultConceptsMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerInterim overall survival analysisTriple-negative breast cancerOverall survival analysisTreatment-related deathsMedian overall survivalNab-paclitaxelPhase 3 trialOverall survivalTreat populationBreast cancerSurvival analysisAtezolizumab groupPlacebo groupInterim analysisTreatment groupsEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusDay 1Interactive voice-web response systemInvestigator-assessed progression-free survivalMeaningful overall survival benefitNew treatment-related deathsProgression-free survival resultsSolid Tumors version 1.1Tumor-infiltrating immune cellsOlaparib and α-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1b trial
Konstantinopoulos PA, Barry WT, Birrer M, Westin SN, Cadoo KA, Shapiro GI, Mayer EL, O'Cearbhaill RE, Coleman RL, Kochupurakkal B, Whalen C, Curtis J, Farooq S, Luo W, Eismann J, Buss MK, Aghajanian C, Mills GB, Palakurthi S, Kirschmeier P, Liu J, Cantley LC, Kaufmann SH, Swisher EM, D'Andrea AD, Winer E, Wulf GM, Matulonis UA. Olaparib and α-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. The Lancet Oncology 2019, 20: 570-580. PMID: 30880072, PMCID: PMC7025391, DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30905-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedMutationOvarian NeoplasmsPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsThiazolesTreatment OutcomeConceptsEpithelial ovarian cancerPhase 2 dosePI3K inhibitor alpelisibPrimary peritoneal cancerPhase 1b trialRecurrent breast cancerGermline BRCA mutationsOvarian cancerBreast cancerDose levelsPeritoneal cancerBRCA mutationsFallopian tubeCommon treatment-related grade 3High-grade serous histologyTreatment-related grade 3Breast Cancer Research FoundationDecreased neutrophil countDose-escalation cohortsDose-expansion cohortsTreatment-related deathsTriple negative histologyResponse Evaluation CriteriaSolid Tumors 1.1Key eligibility criteria
2014
Comparison of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Versus Single-Agent Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer in Women With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance)
Shulman LN, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, Becker HP, Perez EA, O'Regan R, Martino S, Shapiro CL, Schneider CJ, Kimmick G, Burstein HJ, Norton L, Muss H, Hudis CA, Winer EP. Comparison of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Versus Single-Agent Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer in Women With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2014, 32: 2311-2317. PMID: 24934787, PMCID: PMC4105484, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.7142.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRelapse-free survivalSingle-agent paclitaxelOverall survivalHazard ratioBreast cancerTreatment-related deathsCycles of therapyOperable breast cancerPositive axillary nodesPrimary end pointDuration of therapyOptimal adjuvant chemotherapyComparison of doxorubicinAdjuvant chemotherapyCALGB 40101Median followAdjuvant therapyHematologic toxicityPositive nodesAxillary nodesPatient deathBalance efficacyPatientsEnd pointTherapy
2013
Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) versus single-agent paclitaxel (T) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0-3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101.
Shulman L, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Becker H, Perez E, O'Regan R, Martino S, Shapiro C, Atkins J, Schneider C, Kimmick G, Burstein H, Norton L, Muss H, Hudis C, Winer E. Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) versus single-agent paclitaxel (T) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0-3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 1007-1007. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRelapse-free survivalHazard ratioOverall survivalBreast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerCycles of therapyNon-hematologic toxicitiesOperable breast cancerPositive axillary nodesSingle-agent paclitaxelTreatment-related deathsOptimal adjuvant chemotherapyStage breast cancerConfidence intervalsComparison of doxorubicinAdjuvant chemotherapyCALGB 40101Hematologic toxicityAdjuvant therapyPositive nodesPrimary endpointAxillary nodesVs. 4Conclusion of equivalenceGrade 3
2007
Toxicity of Older and Younger Patients Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience
Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Budman DR, Henderson IC, Citron ML, Norton L, Winer EP, Hudis CA. Toxicity of Older and Younger Patients Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2007, 25: 3699-3704. PMID: 17704418, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.10.9710.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdjuvant chemotherapy regimensTreatment-related deathsYounger patientsAdjuvant chemotherapyHematologic toxicityNonhematologic toxicityChemotherapy regimensOlder patientsGrade 3Acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromeNational Cancer Institute grade 3Grade 4 hematologic toxicityLeukemia Group B experienceLeukemia/myelodysplastic syndromeNode-positive breast cancerComparison of cyclophosphamideNode-positive patientsPercent of patientsHealthy older patientsStrict eligibility criteriaRisk of toxicityCALGB 9741Patients 65Elderly patientsOverall survival